Pillay Julian D, van der Ploeg Hidde P, Kolbe-Alexander Tracy L, Proper Karin I, van Stralen Maartje, Tomaz Simone A, van Mechelen Willem, Lambert Estelle V
UCT/MRC Exercise Science and Sports Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 22;15:174. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1381-6.
Walking is recognized as an easily accessible mode of physical activity and is therefore supported as a strategy to promote health and well-being. To complement walking, pedometers have been identified as a useful tool for monitoring ambulatory physical activity, typically measuring total steps/day. There is, however, little information concerning dose-response for health outcomes in relation to intensity or duration of sustained steps. We aimed to examine this relationship, along with factors that mediate it, among employed adults.
A convenience sample, recruited from work-site health risk screening (N = 312, 37 ± 9 yrs), wore a pedometer for at least three consecutive days. Steps were classified as "aerobic" (≥100 steps/minute and ≥10 consecutive minutes) or "non-aerobic" (<100 steps/minute and/or <10 consecutive minutes). The data were sub-grouped according to intensity-based categories i.e. "no aerobic activity", "low aerobic activity" (1-20 minutes/day of aerobic activity) and "high aerobic activity" (≥21 minutes/day of aerobic activity), with the latter used as a proxy for current PA guidelines (150-minutes of moderate-intensity PA per week). Health outcomes included blood pressure, body mass index, percentage body fat, waist circumference, blood cholesterol and blood glucose. Analysis of covariance, adjusting for age, gender and total steps/day were used to compare groups according to volume and intensity-based steps categories. A further analysis compared the mediation effect of body fat estimates (percentage body fat, body mass index and waist circumference) on the association between steps and health outcomes, independently.
Average steps/day were 6,574 ± 3,541; total steps/day were inversely associated with most health outcomes in the expected direction (p < 0.05). The "no aerobic activity" group was significantly different from the "low aerobic activity" and "high aerobic activity" in percentage body fat and diastolic blood pressure only (P < 0.05). Percentage body fat emerged as the strongest mediator of the relationship between steps and outcomes, while body mass index showed the least mediation effect.
The study provides a presentation of cross-sectional pedometer data that relate to a combination of intensity and volume-based steps/day and its relationship to current guidelines. The integration of volume, intensity and duration of ambulatory physical activity in pedometer-based messages is of emerging relevance.
步行被认为是一种易于进行的身体活动方式,因此被作为促进健康和幸福的一项策略加以提倡。为了补充步行活动,计步器已被视为监测日常身体活动的有用工具,通常用于测量每日总步数。然而,关于持续步数的强度或持续时间与健康结果之间的剂量反应关系,目前几乎没有相关信息。我们旨在研究在职成年人中这种关系及其介导因素。
从工作场所健康风险筛查中招募了一个便利样本(N = 312,年龄37±9岁),连续佩戴计步器至少三天。步数被分为“有氧运动”(≥100步/分钟且连续≥10分钟)或“非有氧运动”(<100步/分钟和/或连续<10分钟)。数据根据基于强度的类别进行分组,即“无有氧运动”、“低强度有氧运动”(每天1 - 20分钟有氧运动)和“高强度有氧运动”(每天≥21分钟有氧运动),后者被用作当前身体活动指南(每周150分钟中等强度身体活动)的替代指标。健康结果包括血压、体重指数、体脂百分比、腰围、血液胆固醇和血糖。使用协方差分析,并对年龄、性别和每日总步数进行调整,以根据步数的量和基于强度的类别比较各组。进一步的分析独立比较了体脂估计值(体脂百分比、体重指数和腰围)对步数与健康结果之间关联的中介作用。
平均每日步数为6574±3541步;每日总步数与大多数健康结果呈预期方向的负相关(p < 0.05)。“无有氧运动”组仅在体脂百分比和舒张压方面与“低强度有氧运动”组和“高强度有氧运动”组有显著差异(P < 0.05)。体脂百分比是步数与结果之间关系的最强介导因素,而体重指数的中介作用最小。
本研究展示了与基于强度和量的每日步数组合相关的横断面计步器数据及其与当前指南的关系。将日常身体活动的量、强度和持续时间整合到基于计步器的信息中具有新的相关性。