Hunter D J, Beavers D P, Eckstein F, Guermazi A, Loeser R F, Nicklas B J, Mihalko S L, Miller G D, Lyles M, DeVita P, Legault C, Carr J J, Williamson J D, Messier S P
Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital and Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.
Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Jul;23(7):1090-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
Report the radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) structural outcomes of an 18-month study of diet-induced weight loss, with or without exercise, compared to exercise alone in older, overweight and obese adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 454 overweight and obese (body mass index, BMI = 27-41 kg m(-2)) older (age ≥ 55 yrs) adults with knee pain and radiographic evidence of femorotibial OA. Participants were randomized to one of three 18-month interventions: diet-induced weight loss only (D); diet-induced weight loss plus exercise (D + E); or exercise-only control (E). X-rays (N = 325) and MRIs (N = 105) were acquired at baseline and 18 months follow-up. X-ray and MRI (cartilage thickness and semi-quantitative (SQ)) results were analyzed to compare change between groups at 18-month follow-up using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for baseline values, baseline BMI, and gender.
Mean baseline descriptive characteristics of the cohort included: age, 65.6 yrs; BMI 33.6 kg m(-2); 72% female; 81% white. There was no significant difference between groups in joint space width (JSW) loss; D -0.07 (SE 0.22) mm, D + E -0.27 (SE 0.22) mm and E -0.16 (SE 0.24) mm (P = 0.79). There was also no significant difference in MRI cartilage loss between groups; D -0.10(0.05) mm, D + E -0.13(0.04) mm and E -0.05(0.04) mm (P = 0.42).
Despite the potent effects of weight loss in this study on symptoms as well as mechanistic outcomes (such as joint compressive force and markers of inflammation), there was no statistically significant difference between the three active interventions on the rate of structural progression either on X-ray or MRI over 18-months.
报告一项为期18个月的研究结果,该研究对有症状的膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的老年超重和肥胖成年人进行饮食诱导的体重减轻(无论是否进行运动)与单独运动相比较的X线和磁共振成像(MRI)结构结果。
前瞻性、单盲、随机对照试验,纳入454名超重和肥胖(体重指数,BMI = 27 - 41 kg m⁻²)的老年人(年龄≥55岁),他们有膝关节疼痛且有股骨胫骨OA的X线证据。参与者被随机分配到三种18个月干预措施中的一种:仅饮食诱导的体重减轻(D);饮食诱导的体重减轻加运动(D + E);或仅运动对照(E)。在基线和18个月随访时进行X线检查(N = 325)和MRI检查(N = 105)。分析X线和MRI(软骨厚度和半定量(SQ))结果,使用针对基线值、基线BMI和性别进行调整的协方差分析(ANCOVA)比较18个月随访时组间变化。
该队列的平均基线描述性特征包括:年龄65.6岁;BMI 33.6 kg m⁻²;72%为女性;81%为白人。组间关节间隙宽度(JSW)损失无显著差异;D组为 - 0.07(标准误0.22)mm,D + E组为 - 0.27(标准误0.22)mm,E组为 - 0.16(标准误0.24)mm(P = 0.79)。组间MRI软骨损失也无显著差异;D组为 - 0.10(0.05)mm,D + E组为 - 0.13(0.04)mm,E组为 - 0.05(0.04)mm(P = 0.42)。
尽管本研究中体重减轻对症状以及机制性结果(如关节压缩力和炎症标志物)有显著影响,但在18个月内,三种积极干预措施在X线或MRI上的结构进展率之间无统计学显著差异。