Wagenaar Bradley H, Sherr Kenneth, Fernandes Quinhas, Wagenaar Alexander C
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, Health Alliance International, Seattle, WA, USA,
Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, Health Alliance International, Seattle, WA, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Feb;31(1):129-35. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv029. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
Routine health information systems (RHISs) are in place in nearly every country and provide routinely collected full-coverage records on all levels of health system service delivery. However, these rich sources of data are regularly overlooked for evaluating causal effects of health programmes due to concerns regarding completeness, timeliness, representativeness and accuracy. Using Mozambique's national RHIS (Módulo Básico) as an illustrative example, we urge renewed attention to the use of RHIS data for health evaluations. Interventions to improve data quality exist and have been tested in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Intrinsic features of RHIS data (numerous repeated observations over extended periods of time, full coverage of health facilities, and numerous real-time indicators of service coverage and utilization) provide for very robust quasi-experimental designs, such as controlled interrupted time-series (cITS), which are not possible with intermittent community sample surveys. In addition, cITS analyses are well suited for continuously evolving development contexts in LMICs by: (1) allowing for measurement and controlling for trends and other patterns before, during and after intervention implementation; (2) facilitating the use of numerous simultaneous control groups and non-equivalent dependent variables at multiple nested levels to increase validity and strength of causal inference; and (3) allowing the integration of continuous 'effective dose received' implementation measures. With expanded use of RHIS data for the evaluation of health programmes, investments in data systems, health worker interest in and utilization of RHIS data, as well as data quality will further increase over time. Because RHIS data are ministry-owned and operated, relying upon these data will contribute to sustainable national capacity over time.
几乎每个国家都设有常规卫生信息系统(RHISs),这些系统提供了关于卫生系统各级服务提供情况的常规收集的全面记录。然而,由于对完整性、及时性、代表性和准确性的担忧,这些丰富的数据来源在评估卫生项目的因果效应时经常被忽视。以莫桑比克的国家RHIS(基本模块)为例,我们敦促重新关注利用RHIS数据进行卫生评估。改善数据质量的干预措施已经存在,并已在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)进行了测试。RHIS数据的内在特征(长时间内的大量重复观察、卫生设施的全面覆盖以及服务覆盖和利用的众多实时指标)为非常稳健的准实验设计提供了条件,例如对照中断时间序列(cITS),而间歇性社区样本调查则无法做到这一点。此外,cITS分析非常适合低收入和中等收入国家不断变化的发展环境,原因如下:(1)允许在干预实施之前、期间和之后测量和控制趋势及其他模式;(2)便于在多个嵌套层次上使用众多同时存在的对照组和非等效因变量,以提高因果推断的有效性和力度;(3)允许整合连续的“接受的有效剂量”实施措施。随着越来越多地利用RHIS数据来评估卫生项目,对数据系统的投资、卫生工作者对RHIS数据的兴趣和利用以及数据质量将随着时间的推移而进一步提高。由于RHIS数据由卫生部拥有和运营,依靠这些数据将有助于随着时间的推移建立可持续的国家能力。