Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者门诊就诊情况的确定:国家门诊医疗护理调查(NAMCS)和国家医院门诊医疗护理调查(NHAMCS)。

Ascertainment of outpatient visits by patients with diabetes: The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS).

作者信息

Asao Keiko, McEwen Laura N, Lee Joyce M, Herman William H

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 66N. Pauline St., Ste. 633, Memphis, TN 38111, USA; Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Michigan, 1000 Wall St., Brehm Center Room 6111, Ann Arbor, MI 48105-5714, USA.

Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Michigan, 1000 Wall St., Brehm Center Room 6111, Ann Arbor, MI 48105-5714, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Complications. 2015 Jul;29(5):650-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

Abstract

AIMS

To estimate and evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of providers' diagnosis codes and medication lists to identify outpatient visits by patients with diabetes.

METHODS

We used data from the 2006 to 2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of providers' diagnoses and medication lists to identify patients with diabetes, using the checkbox for diabetes as the gold standard. We then examined differences in sensitivity by patients' characteristics using multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The checkbox identified 12,647 outpatient visits by adults with diabetes among the 70,352 visits used for this analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of providers' diagnoses or listed diabetes medications were 72.3% (95% CI: 70.8% to 73.8%) and 99.2% (99.1% to 99.4%), respectively. Diabetic patients ≥75 years of age, women, non-Hispanics, and those with private insurance or Medicare were more likely to be missed by providers' diagnoses and medication lists. Diabetic patients who had more diagnosis codes and medications recorded, had glucose or hemoglobin A1c measured, or made office- rather than hospital-outpatient visits were less likely to be missed.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers' diagnosis codes and medication lists fail to identify approximately one quarter of outpatient visits by patients with diabetes.

摘要

目的

评估并评价医疗服务提供者的诊断编码和用药清单识别糖尿病患者门诊就诊情况的敏感性和特异性。

方法

我们使用了2006年至2010年全国门诊医疗护理调查和全国医院门诊医疗护理调查的数据。我们以糖尿病复选框作为金标准,评估医疗服务提供者的诊断和用药清单识别糖尿病患者的敏感性和特异性。然后,我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型研究了不同患者特征下敏感性的差异。

结果

在本次分析所用的70352次就诊中,复选框识别出12647次成年糖尿病患者的门诊就诊。医疗服务提供者的诊断或列出的糖尿病药物的敏感性和特异性分别为72.3%(95%置信区间:70.8%至73.8%)和99.2%(99.1%至99.4%)。年龄≥75岁的糖尿病患者、女性、非西班牙裔以及那些有私人保险或医疗保险的患者更有可能被医疗服务提供者的诊断和用药清单遗漏。记录了更多诊断编码和药物、进行了血糖或糖化血红蛋白测量或进行门诊而非医院门诊就诊的糖尿病患者被遗漏的可能性较小。

结论

医疗服务提供者的诊断编码和用药清单未能识别出约四分之一的糖尿病患者门诊就诊情况。

相似文献

2
Assessing the burden of diabetes mellitus in emergency departments in the United States: the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS).
J Diabetes Complications. 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):639-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

2
National Prevalence of Alcohol and Other Substance Use Disorders Among Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations: NHAMCS 2014-2018.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(10):2420-2428. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07069-w. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
3
Intergenerational educational mobility and type 2 diabetes in the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging.
Ann Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;65:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
4
The Utilization and Costs of Grade D USPSTF Services in Medicare, 2007-2016.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Dec;36(12):3711-3718. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06784-8. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
5
Electrocardiogram and cardiac testing among patients in the emergency department with seizure versus syncope.
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;6(2):106-112. doi: 10.15441/ceem.18.003. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
6
Differences in National Diabetes Treatment Patterns and Trends between Older and Younger Adults.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 May;67(5):1066-1073. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15790. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
Visits for Depression to Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners in the USA.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;45(2):310-319. doi: 10.1007/s11414-017-9579-2.
9
Is diabetes prevalence higher among HIV-infected individuals compared with the general population? Evidence from MMP and NHANES 2009-2010.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Jan 5;5(1):e000304. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000304. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the burden of diabetes mellitus in emergency departments in the United States: the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS).
J Diabetes Complications. 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):639-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis of validation studies on a diabetes case definition from health administrative records.
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 9;8(10):e75256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075256. eCollection 2013.
4
Prescribing trends for the outpatient treatment of adolescents and young adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Oct;18(8):607-14. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.8.607.
6
Excessive hospitalizations and its associated economic burden among people with diabetes in the United States.
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):267-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00443.x.
7
Estimating model-adjusted risks, risk differences, and risk ratios from complex survey data.
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Mar 1;171(5):618-23. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp440. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
8
Prevalence of diabetes and high risk for diabetes using A1C criteria in the U.S. population in 1988-2006.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):562-8. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1524. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
9
Rate of obesity in U.S. ambulatory patients with diabetes mellitus: a national assessment of office-based physician visits.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2009 Aug;3(3):197-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Jul 30.
10
Secular trends in diabetes-related preventable hospitalizations in the United States, 1998-2006.
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1213-7. doi: 10.2337/dc08-2211. Epub 2009 Apr 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验