Justo Julie Ann, Mayer Stockton M, Pai Manjunath P, Soriano Melinda M, Danziger Larry H, Novak Richard M, Rodvold Keith A
College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Jul;59(7):3956-65. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00498-15. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
The pharmacokinetic profile of ceftaroline has not been well characterized in obese adults. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline in 32 healthy adult volunteers aged 18 to 50 years in the normal, overweight, and obese body size ranges. Subjects were evenly assigned to 1 of 4 groups based on their body mass index (BMI) and total body weight (TBW) (ranges, 22.1 to 63.5 kg/m(2) and 50.1 to 179.5 kg, respectively). Subjects in the lower-TBW groups were matched by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and serum creatinine to the upper-BMI groups. Serial plasma and urine samples were collected over 12 h after the start of the infusion, and the concentrations of ceftaroline fosamil (prodrug), ceftaroline, and ceftaroline M-1 (inactive metabolite) were assayed. Noncompartmental and population pharmacokinetic analyses were used to evaluate the data. The mean plasma ceftaroline maximum concentration and area under the curve were ca. 30% lower in subjects with a BMI of ≥40 kg/m(2) compared to those <30 kg/m(2). A five-compartment pharmacokinetic model with zero-order infusion and first-order elimination optimally described the plasma concentration-time profiles of the prodrug and ceftaroline. Estimated creatinine clearance (eCLCR) and TBW best explained ceftaroline clearance and volume of distribution, respectively. Although lower ceftaroline plasma concentrations were observed in obese subjects, Monte Carlo simulations suggest the probability of target attainment is ≥90% when the MIC is ≤1 μg/ml irrespective of TBW or eCLCR. No dosage adjustment for ceftaroline appears to be necessary based on TBW alone in adults with comparable eCLCR. Confirmation of these findings in infected obese patients is necessary to validate these findings in healthy volunteers. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01648127.).
头孢洛林在肥胖成年人中的药代动力学特征尚未得到充分表征。本研究的目的是评估头孢洛林在32名年龄在18至50岁、体型正常、超重和肥胖的健康成年志愿者中的药代动力学。根据受试者的体重指数(BMI)和总体重(TBW)(范围分别为22.1至63.5 kg/m²和50.1至179.5 kg)将其平均分配到4组中的1组。低TBW组的受试者在年龄、性别、种族/民族和血清肌酐方面与高BMI组相匹配。在输注开始后的12小时内收集系列血浆和尿液样本,并测定头孢洛林磷酰胺(前体药物)、头孢洛林和头孢洛林M-1(无活性代谢物)的浓度。采用非房室和群体药代动力学分析来评估数据。与BMI<30 kg/m²的受试者相比,BMI≥40 kg/m²的受试者的血浆头孢洛林最大浓度和曲线下面积约低30%。具有零级输注和一级消除的五房室药代动力学模型能最佳地描述前体药物和头孢洛林的血浆浓度-时间曲线。估计的肌酐清除率(eCLCR)和TBW分别最能解释头孢洛林的清除率和分布容积。尽管在肥胖受试者中观察到较低的头孢洛林血浆浓度,但蒙特卡洛模拟表明,当最低抑菌浓度(MIC)≤1 μg/ml时,无论TBW或eCLCR如何,达到目标浓度的概率≥90%。对于具有可比eCLCR的成年人,仅根据TBW似乎无需调整头孢洛林的剂量。有必要在感染的肥胖患者中证实这些发现,以验证在健康志愿者中的这些结果。(本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT01648127。)