Tsiachristas A, Wallenburg I, Bond C M, Elliot R F, Busse R, van Exel J, Rutten-van Mölken M P, de Bont A
Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Policy. 2015 Sep;119(9):1176-87. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
One way in which governments are seeking to improve the efficiency of the health care sector is by redesigning health services to contain labour costs. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of new professional roles on a wide range of health service outcomes and costs. A systematic literature review was performed by searching in different databases for evaluation papers of new professional roles (published 1985-2013). The PRISMA checklist was used to conduct and report the systematic literature review and the EPHPP-Quality Assessment Tool to assess the quality of the studies. Forty-one studies of specialist nurses (SNs) and advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs) were selected for data extraction and analysis. The 25 SN studies evaluated most often quality of life (10 studies), clinical outcomes (8), and costs (8). Significant advantages were seen most frequently regarding health care utilization (in 3 of 3 studies), patient information (5 of 6), and patient satisfaction (4 of 6). The 16 ANP studies evaluated most often patient satisfaction (8), clinical outcomes (5), and costs (5). Significant advantages were seen most frequently regarding clinical outcomes (5 of 5), patient information (3 of 4), and patient satisfaction (5 of 8). Promoting new professional roles may help improve health care delivery and possibly contain costs. Exploring the optimal skill-mix deserves further attention from health care professionals, researchers and policy makers.
政府提高医疗保健部门效率的一种方式是重新设计医疗服务以控制劳动力成本。本研究的目的是调查新的专业角色对广泛的医疗服务结果和成本的影响。通过在不同数据库中搜索新专业角色的评估论文(发表于1985 - 2013年)进行了系统的文献综述。使用PRISMA清单进行并报告系统的文献综述,使用EPHPP质量评估工具评估研究质量。选择了41项关于专科护士(SNs)和高级执业护士(ANPs)的研究进行数据提取和分析。25项关于专科护士的研究最常评估的是生活质量(10项研究)、临床结果(8项)和成本(8项)。在医疗保健利用(3项研究中的3项)、患者信息(6项中的5项)和患者满意度(6项中的4项)方面最常看到显著优势。16项关于高级执业护士的研究最常评估的是患者满意度(8项)、临床结果(5项)和成本(5项)。在临床结果(5项中的5项)、患者信息(4项中的3项)和患者满意度(8项中的5项)方面最常看到显著优势。推广新的专业角色可能有助于改善医疗服务的提供,并可能控制成本。探索最佳技能组合值得医疗保健专业人员、研究人员和政策制定者进一步关注。