Hung Chi-Fa, Breen Gerome, Czamara Darina, Corre Tanguy, Wolf Christiane, Kloiber Stefan, Bergmann Sven, Craddock Nick, Gill Michael, Holsboer Florian, Jones Lisa, Jones Ian, Korszun Ania, Kutalik Zoltan, Lucae Susanne, Maier Wolfgang, Mors Ole, Owen Michael J, Rice John, Rietschel Marcella, Uher Rudolf, Vollenweider Peter, Waeber Gerard, Craig Ian W, Farmer Anne E, Lewis Cathryn M, Müller-Myhsok Bertram, Preisig Martin, McGuffin Peter, Rivera Margarita
MRC SGDP Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, Box PO82, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, 833, Taiwan.
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 17;13:86. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0334-3.
Obesity is strongly associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) and various other diseases. Genome-wide association studies have identified multiple risk loci robustly associated with body mass index (BMI). In this study, we aimed to investigate whether a genetic risk score (GRS) combining multiple BMI risk loci might have utility in prediction of obesity in patients with MDD.
Linear and logistic regression models were conducted to predict BMI and obesity, respectively, in three independent large case-control studies of major depression (Radiant, GSK-Munich, PsyCoLaus). The analyses were first performed in the whole sample and then separately in depressed cases and controls. An unweighted GRS was calculated by summation of the number of risk alleles. A weighted GRS was calculated as the sum of risk alleles at each locus multiplied by their effect sizes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the discriminatory ability of predictors of obesity.
In the discovery phase, a total of 2,521 participants (1,895 depressed patients and 626 controls) were included from the Radiant study. Both unweighted and weighted GRS were highly associated with BMI (P < 0.001) but explained only a modest amount of variance. Adding 'traditional' risk factors to GRS significantly improved the predictive ability with the area under the curve (AUC) in the ROC analysis, increasing from 0.58 to 0.66 (95% CI, 0.62-0.68; χ(2) = 27.68; P < 0.0001). Although there was no formal evidence of interaction between depression status and GRS, there was further improvement in AUC in the ROC analysis when depression status was added to the model (AUC = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.68-0.73; χ(2) = 28.64; P <0.0001). We further found that the GRS accounted for more variance of BMI in depressed patients than in healthy controls. Again, GRS discriminated obesity better in depressed patients compared to healthy controls. We later replicated these analyses in two independent samples (GSK-Munich and PsyCoLaus) and found similar results.
A GRS proved to be a highly significant predictor of obesity in people with MDD but accounted for only modest amount of variance. Nevertheless, as more risk loci are identified, combining a GRS approach with information on non-genetic risk factors could become a useful strategy in identifying MDD patients at higher risk of developing obesity.
肥胖与重度抑郁症(MDD)及其他多种疾病密切相关。全基因组关联研究已确定了多个与体重指数(BMI)密切相关的风险位点。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨结合多个BMI风险位点的遗传风险评分(GRS)是否有助于预测MDD患者的肥胖情况。
在三项独立的大型抑郁症病例对照研究(Radiant、GSK - 慕尼黑、PsyCoLaus)中,分别采用线性回归模型和逻辑回归模型预测BMI和肥胖情况。分析首先在全样本中进行,然后分别在抑郁症患者和对照中进行。通过对风险等位基因数量求和计算未加权GRS。通过将每个位点的风险等位基因与其效应大小相乘后求和计算加权GRS。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析比较肥胖预测指标的鉴别能力。
在发现阶段,Radiant研究共纳入2521名参与者(1895名抑郁症患者和626名对照)。未加权和加权GRS均与BMI高度相关(P < 0.001),但仅解释了适度的变异量。在GRS中加入“传统”风险因素显著提高了ROC分析中的预测能力,曲线下面积(AUC)从0.58增加到0.66(95%CI,0.62 - 0.68;χ(2)= 27.68;P < 0.0001)。虽然没有正式证据表明抑郁状态与GRS之间存在相互作用,但在模型中加入抑郁状态后,ROC分析中的AUC进一步提高(AUC = 0.71;95%CI,0.68 - 0.73;χ(2)= 28.64;P < 0.0001)。我们进一步发现,GRS在抑郁症患者中解释的BMI变异比健康对照更多。同样,与健康对照相比,GRS在抑郁症患者中对肥胖的鉴别能力更强。随后我们在另外两个独立样本(GSK - 慕尼黑和PsyCoLaus)中重复了这些分析,得到了相似的结果。
GRS被证明是MDD患者肥胖的一个高度显著的预测指标,但仅解释了适度的变异量。然而,随着更多风险位点的确定,将GRS方法与非遗传风险因素信息相结合可能成为识别肥胖风险较高的MDD患者的有用策略。