Trish Erin E, Herring Bradley J
Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, and Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Los Angeles Verna and Peter Dauterive Hall 301-3 635 Downey Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089-3333, United States.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, 624 North Broadway, Room 408, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
J Health Econ. 2015 Jul;42:104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
The US health insurance industry is highly concentrated, and health insurance premiums are high and rising rapidly. Policymakers have focused on the possible link between the two, leading to ACA provisions to increase insurer competition. However, while market power may enable insurers to include higher profit margins in their premiums, it may also result in stronger bargaining leverage with hospitals to negotiate lower payment rates to partially offset these higher premiums. We empirically examine the relationship between employer-sponsored fully-insured health insurance premiums and the level of concentration in local insurer and hospital markets using the nationally-representative 2006-2011 KFF/HRET Employer Health Benefits Survey. We exploit a unique feature of employer-sponsored insurance, in which self-insured employers purchase only administrative services from managed care organizations, to disentangle these different effects on insurer concentration by constructing one concentration measure representing fully-insured plans' transactions with employers and the other concentration measure representing insurers' bargaining with hospitals. As expected, we find that premiums are indeed higher for plans sold in markets with higher levels of concentration relevant to insurer transactions with employers, lower for plans in markets with higher levels of insurer concentration relevant to insurer bargaining with hospitals, and higher for plans in markets with higher levels of hospital market concentration.
美国医疗保险行业高度集中,医疗保险费用高昂且迅速上涨。政策制定者关注到两者之间可能存在的联系,因此《平价医疗法案》出台了相关条款以增强保险公司之间的竞争。然而,市场势力虽然可能使保险公司在保费中纳入更高的利润率,但也可能使其在与医院谈判时拥有更强的议价能力,从而协商降低支付费率,以部分抵消这些更高的保费。我们利用具有全国代表性的2006 - 2011年凯泽家庭基金会/医疗保健研究与教育信托基金雇主健康福利调查,实证研究雇主提供的全额保险医疗保险保费与当地保险公司和医院市场集中度之间的关系。我们利用雇主提供保险的一个独特特征,即自保雇主仅从管理式医疗组织购买行政服务,通过构建一个代表全额保险计划与雇主交易的集中度指标和另一个代表保险公司与医院议价的集中度指标,来厘清这些对保险公司集中度的不同影响。正如预期的那样,我们发现,对于在与保险公司和雇主交易相关的集中度较高的市场中销售的保险计划,保费确实更高;对于在与保险公司和医院议价相关的保险公司集中度较高的市场中的计划,保费较低;而对于在医院市场集中度较高的市场中的计划,保费则更高。