Suppr超能文献

用于支持产志贺毒素大肠杆菌生长的增菌肉汤的比较

Comparison of Enrichment Broths for Supporting Growth of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli.

作者信息

Stromberg Zachary R, Lewis Gentry L, Marx David B, Moxley Rodney A

机构信息

School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1880 N. 42nd St., Lincoln, NE, 68583-0905, USA.

出版信息

Curr Microbiol. 2015 Aug;71(2):214-9. doi: 10.1007/s00284-015-0824-8. Epub 2015 Apr 28.

Abstract

Detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in complex sample matrices remains challenging. In an attempt to improve detection, nonselective and selective enrichment broths were compared as follows: (1) trypticase soy broth (TSB) was compared with TSB plus novobiocin, vancomycin, rifampicin, bile salts, and potassium tellurite (TSB-NVRBT) for supporting growth of STEC in pure culture; (2) E. coli broth (EC), TSB, and TSB plus bile salts (mTSB) were compared for enrichment of STEC O26, O45, O103, O104, O111, O121, O145, and O157 (STEC-8) in inoculated cattle fecal samples; (3) EC, TSB, and mTSB were compared for the detection of STEC-8 in inoculated cattle fecal samples. Fecal samples were inoculated with wild-type STEC-8 or nalidixic acid- or rifampicin-resistant derivatives of the same strains at 100, 1000, or 10,000 colony-forming units per gram (CFU/g) of feces. In pure culture, the mean STEC CFU/mL following enrichment in TSB was 1.17 log10 greater than that in TSB-NVRBT (P < 0.05). In inoculated fecal samples, EC enrichment yielded growth of STEC-8 (6.42 log10 CFU/g) that was significantly greater than in TSB (6.23 log10 CFU/g; P < 0.05), and numerically but not significantly greater than in mTSB (6.37 log10 CFU/g; P = 0.60). Wild-type STEC strains were detected in 43.8 % (21/48) of the samples enriched in EC and mTSB compared to 27.1 % (13/48) of the samples enriched in TSB (P = 0.15). Overall, STEC grew significantly better when enriched in EC compared to TSB. Modification of TSB by the addition of bile salts improved the growth and detection of STEC compared to TSB alone.

摘要

在复杂样本基质中检测产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)仍然具有挑战性。为了提高检测效果,对非选择性和选择性增菌肉汤进行了如下比较:(1)比较胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤(TSB)与添加了新生霉素、万古霉素、利福平、胆盐和亚碲酸钾的TSB(TSB-NVRBT)在纯培养中对STEC生长的支持作用;(2)比较大肠杆菌肉汤(EC)、TSB以及添加了胆盐的TSB(mTSB)对接种了牛粪便样本中STEC O26、O45、O103、O104、O111、O121、O145和O157(STEC-8)的富集效果;(3)比较EC、TSB和mTSB对接种了牛粪便样本中STEC-8的检测效果。粪便样本以每克粪便100、1000或10000个菌落形成单位(CFU/g)接种野生型STEC-8或相同菌株的耐萘啶酸或耐利福平衍生物。在纯培养中,TSB增菌后STEC的平均CFU/mL比TSB-NVRBT高1.17个对数10(P < 0.05)。在接种的粪便样本中,EC增菌使STEC-8生长(6.42个对数10 CFU/g),显著高于TSB(6.23个对数10 CFU/g;P < 0.05),且在数值上高于mTSB(6.37个对数10 CFU/g;P = 0.60)但无显著差异。在EC和mTSB增菌的样本中,43.8%(21/48)检测到野生型STEC菌株,而在TSB增菌的样本中为27.1%(13/48)(P = 0.15)。总体而言,与TSB相比,STEC在EC中增菌时生长显著更好。与单独的TSB相比,添加胆盐对TSB进行改良可改善STEC的生长和检测效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验