Yaseen Zaneb, English Christopher, Stanbury Spencer J, Chen Tony, Messing Susan, Awad Hani, Elfar John C
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Hand and Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Hand and Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Jul;40(7):1363-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
We hypothesized that increasing core sutures (4-6) may be preferable in terms of gliding coefficient (GC) measurements when compared with adding an epitendinous suture to zone II flexor tendon repairs. We hypothesized that the inclusion of epitendinous suture in 2 standard repairs would contribute negatively to the GC of the repaired tendon.
Nineteen fresh-frozen cadaveric fingers were used for testing. We compared a control group (dissected digits without repair) and 4-strand or 6-strand core tendon repairs with and without epitendinous suture. Arc of motion was driven by direct loading, and digital images were acquired and analyzed. Outcomes were defined as the difference in GC between the native uninjured and the repaired state at each load. A linear mixed-model analysis was performed with comparisons between repairs to evaluate the statistically relevant differences between groups.
The test of fixed effects in the linear model revealed that repair type and the use of epitendinous suture significantly affected the change in GC. The addition of an epitendinous suture produced a significant decrement in gliding regardless of repair type.
There was significant improvement in GC with the omission of the epitendinous suture in both repair types (4- or 6-strand).
The epitendinous suture used in this model resulted in poorer gliding of the repair, which may correspond with an expected increase in catching or triggering.
我们推测,与在Ⅱ区屈指肌腱修复中添加腱周缝合线相比,增加核心缝线(4 - 6根)在滑动系数(GC)测量方面可能更具优势。我们还推测,在两种标准修复中加入腱周缝合线会对修复肌腱的GC产生负面影响。
使用19根新鲜冷冻的尸体手指进行测试。我们比较了一个对照组(未修复的解剖手指)以及有和没有腱周缝合线的4股或6股核心肌腱修复。通过直接加载驱动运动弧度,并采集和分析数字图像。结果定义为在每个负荷下,未受伤的天然状态与修复状态之间GC的差异。进行线性混合模型分析,并对修复之间进行比较,以评估组间的统计学显著差异。
线性模型中的固定效应测试表明,修复类型和腱周缝合线的使用对GC的变化有显著影响。无论修复类型如何,添加腱周缝合线都会使滑动显著减少。
在两种修复类型(4股或6股)中,省略腱周缝合线后GC有显著改善。
该模型中使用的腱周缝合线导致修复的滑动较差,这可能与预期的卡顿或触发增加相对应。