Kang Kun-Tai, Weng Wen-Chin, Lee Chia-Hsuan, Hsiao Tzu-Yu, Lee Pei-Lin, Lee Yungling Leo, Hsu Wei-Chung
Department of Otolaryngology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Otolaryngology, Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Sleep Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sleep Med. 2015 May;16(5):617-24. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.12.018. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
To assess how history and/or anatomical findings differ in diagnosing pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Children aged 2-18 years were recruited and assessed for anatomical (ie, tonsil size, adenoid size, and obesity) and historical findings (ie, symptoms) using a standard sheet. History and anatomical findings, as well as those measures significantly correlated with OSA, were identified to establish the historical, anatomical, and the combined model. OSA was diagnosed by polysomnography. The effectiveness of those models in detecting OSA was analyzed by model fit, discrimination (C-index), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test), and reclassification properties.
A total of 222 children were enrolled. The anatomical model included tonsil hypertrophy, adenoid hypertrophy, and obesity, whereas the historical model included snoring frequency, snoring duration, awakening, and breathing pause. The C-index was 0.84 for the combined model, which significantly differed from that in the anatomical (0.78, p = 0.003) and historical models (0.72, p < 0.001). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revealed an adequate fit for all of the models. Additionally, the combined model more accurately reclassified 10.3% (p = 0.044) and 21.9% (p = 0.003) of all of the subjects than either the anatomical or historical model. Internal validation of the combined model by the bootstrapping method showed a fair model performance.
Overall performance of combined anatomical and historical findings offers incremental utility in detecting OSA. Results of this study suggest integrating both history and anatomical findings for a screening scheme of pediatric OSA.
评估病史和/或解剖学检查结果在诊断儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)方面有何不同。
招募2至18岁的儿童,使用标准表格评估其解剖学(即扁桃体大小、腺样体大小和肥胖情况)和病史检查结果(即症状)。确定与OSA显著相关的病史和解剖学检查结果,以及那些指标,以建立病史模型、解剖学模型和联合模型。通过多导睡眠图诊断OSA。通过模型拟合、区分度(C指数)、校准(Hosmer-Lemeshow检验)和重新分类特性分析这些模型在检测OSA方面的有效性。
共纳入222名儿童。解剖学模型包括扁桃体肥大、腺样体肥大和肥胖,而病史模型包括打鼾频率、打鼾持续时间、觉醒和呼吸暂停。联合模型的C指数为0.84,与解剖学模型(0.78,p = 0.003)和病史模型(0.72,p < 0.001)的C指数有显著差异。Hosmer-Lemeshow检验显示所有模型的拟合度良好。此外,联合模型比解剖学模型或病史模型更准确地对所有受试者中的10.3%(p = 0.044)和21.9%(p = 0.003)进行了重新分类。通过自举法对联合模型进行内部验证,显示模型性能良好。
解剖学检查结果和病史检查结果相结合的总体表现,在检测OSA方面具有额外的效用。本研究结果表明,在儿童OSA筛查方案中应综合考虑病史和解剖学检查结果。