Kamarul Zaman Mazuin, Chin Kin-Fah, Rai Vineya, Majid Hazreen Abdul
Mazuin Kamarul Zaman, Hazreen Abdul Majid, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 7;21(17):5372-81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5372.
To investigate fiber and prebiotic supplementation of enteral nutrition (EN) for diarrhea, fecal microbiota and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs).
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, and Web of Science databases were searched for human experimental and observational cohort studies conducted between January 1990 and June 2014. The keywords used for the literature search were fiber, prebiotics and enteral nutrition. English language studies with adult patient populations on exclusive EN were selected. Abstracts and/or full texts of selected studies were reviewed and agreed upon by two independent researchers for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Tools used for the quality assessment were Jadad Scale and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature.
A total of 456 possible articles were retrieved, and 430 were excluded due to lack of appropriate data. Of the 26 remaining studies, only eight investigated the effects of prebiotics. Results of the meta-analysis indicated that overall, fiber reduces diarrhea in patients receiving EN (OR = 0.47; 95%CI: 0.29-0.77; P = 0.02). Subgroup analysis revealed a positive effect of fiber supplementation in EN towards diarrhea in stable patients (OR = 0.31; 95%CI: 0.19-0.51; P < 0.01), but not in critically ill patients (OR = 0.89; 95%CI: 0.41-1.92; P = 0.77). Prebiotic supplementation in EN does not improve the incidence of diarrhea despite its manipulative effect on bifidobacteria concentrations and SCFA in healthy humans. In addition, the effect of fiber and/or prebiotic supplementation towards fecal microbiota and SCFA remain disputable.
Fiber helps minimize diarrhea in patients receiving EN, particularly in non-critically ill patients. However, the effect of prebiotics in moderating diarrhea is inconclusive.
研究肠内营养(EN)补充纤维和益生元对腹泻、粪便微生物群和短链脂肪酸(SCFAs)的影响。
检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、CINAHL、学术搜索高级版和科学网数据库,查找1990年1月至2014年6月期间进行的人体实验和观察性队列研究。文献检索所用关键词为纤维、益生元和肠内营养。选择针对成年患者群体的纯EN英文研究。两名独立研究人员对所选研究的摘要和/或全文进行审查并商定是否纳入荟萃分析。用于质量评估的工具为Jadad量表和苏格兰跨学院指南网络医学文献批判性评价。
共检索到456篇可能的文章,其中430篇因缺乏适当数据而被排除。在其余26项研究中,只有8项研究了益生元的作用。荟萃分析结果表明,总体而言,纤维可减少接受EN患者的腹泻(OR = 0.47;95%CI:0.29 - 0.77;P = 0.02)。亚组分析显示,补充纤维对稳定患者的EN相关性腹泻有积极作用(OR = 0.31;95%CI:0.19 - 0.51;P < 0.01),但对危重症患者无此作用(OR = 0.89;95%CI:0.41 - 1.92;P = 0.77)。EN补充益生元虽对健康人体内双歧杆菌浓度和SCFA有调节作用,但并不能改善腹泻发生率。此外,补充纤维和/或益生元对粪便微生物群和SCFA的影响仍存在争议。
纤维有助于减少接受EN患者的腹泻,尤其是非危重症患者。然而,益生元对缓解腹泻的作用尚无定论。