Suppr超能文献

临床信息对内镜活动度评估的影响:溃疡性结肠炎内镜严重程度指数[UCEIS]的特征

The Impact of Clinical Information on the Assessment of Endoscopic Activity: Characteristics of the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index Of Severity [UCEIS].

作者信息

Travis Simon P L, Schnell Dan, Feagan Brian G, Abreu Maria T, Altman Douglas G, Hanauer Stephen B, Krzeski Piotr, Lichtenstein Gary R, Marteau Philippe R, Mary Jean-Yves, Reinisch Walter, Sands Bruce E, Schnell Patrick, Yacyshyn Bruce R, Colombel Jean-Frédéric, Bernhardt Christian A, Sandborn William J

机构信息

Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

Middletown, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Crohns Colitis. 2015 Aug;9(8):607-16. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv077. Epub 2015 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To determine whether clinical information influences endoscopic scoring by central readers using the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity [UCEIS; comprising 'vascular pattern', 'bleeding', 'erosions and ulcers'].

METHODS

Forty central readers performed 28 evaluations, including 2 repeats, from a library of 44 video sigmoidoscopies stratified by Mayo Clinic Score. Following training, readers were randomised to scoring with ['unblinded', n = 20, including 4 control videos with misleading information] or without ['blinded', n 20] clinical information. A total of 21 virtual Central Reader Groups [CRGs], of three blinded readers, were created. Agreement criteria were pre-specified. Kappa [κ] statistics quantified intra- and inter-reader variability.

RESULTS

Mean UCEIS scores did not differ between blinded and unblinded readers for any of the 40 main videos. UCEIS standard deviations [SD] were similar [median blinded 0.94, unblinded 0.93; p = 0.97]. Correlation between UCEIS and visual analogue scale [VAS] assessment of overall severity was high [r blinded = 0.90, unblinded = 0.93; p = 0.02]. Scores for control videos were similar [UCEIS: p ≥ 0.55; VAS: p ≥ 0.07]. Intra- [κ 0.47-0.74] and inter-reader [κ 0.40-0.53] variability for items and full UCEIS was 'moderate'-to-'substantial', with no significant differences except for intra-reader variability for erosions and ulcers [κ blinded: 0.47 vs unblinded: 0.74; p 0.047]. The SD of CRGs was lower than for individual central readers [0.54 vs 0.95; p < 0.001]. Correlation between blinded UCEIS and patient-reported symptoms was high [stool frequency: 0.76; rectal bleeding: 0.82; both: 0.81].

CONCLUSIONS

The UCEIS is minimally affected by knowledge of clinical details, strongly correlates with patient-reported symptoms, and is a suitable instrument for trials. CRGs performed better than individuals.

摘要

背景与目的

使用溃疡性结肠炎内镜严重程度指数[UCEIS;包括“血管形态”、“出血”、“糜烂和溃疡”]来确定临床信息是否会影响中心阅片者的内镜评分。

方法

40名中心阅片者对44段乙状结肠镜视频库中的28次评估(包括2次重复评估)进行评分,这些视频按梅奥诊所评分进行分层。培训后,阅片者被随机分为两组,一组在有临床信息的情况下评分[“未设盲”,n = 20,包括4段带有误导性信息的对照视频],另一组在无临床信息的情况下评分[“设盲”,n = 20]。共创建了21个由三名设盲阅片者组成的虚拟中心阅片者小组[CRG]。预先设定了一致性标准。kappa[κ]统计量用于量化阅片者内部和阅片者之间的变异性。

结果

对于40段主要视频中的任何一段,设盲和未设盲阅片者的UCEIS平均评分均无差异。UCEIS标准差[SD]相似[设盲组中位数为0.94,未设盲组为0.93;p = 0.97]。UCEIS与整体严重程度的视觉模拟量表[VAS]评估之间的相关性很高[r设盲 = 0.90,未设盲 = 0.93;p = 0.02]。对照视频的评分相似[UCEIS:p≥0.55;VAS:p≥0.07]。各项目及完整UCEIS的阅片者内部变异性[κ 0.47 - 0.74]和阅片者之间的变异性[κ 0.40 - 0.53]为“中等”至“较大”,除了糜烂和溃疡的阅片者内部变异性存在显著差异外[κ设盲:0.47 vs未设盲:0.74;p = 0.047]。CRG的标准差低于个体中心阅片者[0.54 vs 0.95;p < 0.001]。设盲UCEIS与患者报告症状之间的相关性很高[大便频率:0.76;直肠出血:0.82;两者:0.81]。

结论

UCEIS受临床细节知识的影响最小,与患者报告症状密切相关,是适合试验使用的工具。CRG的表现优于个体阅片者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fd1/4584567/e39c078648e9/eccojc_jjv077_f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验