Bassarova Assia, Trøen Gunhild, Spetalen Signe, Micci Francesca, Tierens Anne, Delabie Jan
From the Department of Pathology, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;
University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Pathology and.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2015 Jun;143(6):797-806. doi: 10.1309/AJCP6ZODWV1CIDME.
The differential diagnosis between bone marrow involvement by lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is challenging because histology and immunophenotype of both diseases overlap. We revisited the diagnostic pathology features of both diseases in the bone marrow.
We studied a series of bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens from 59 patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia without extramedullary involvement and bone marrow biopsy specimens from 23 patients with well-characterized MZL who also had bone marrow involvement. H&E- and immunoperoxidase-stained sections of bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens as well as flow cytometry and classic cytogenetics performed on aspirations were reviewed. The study was complemented with MYD88 L265P mutation analysis of all samples.
The most distinguishing features of LPL with respect to MZL were focal paratrabecular involvement (P < .001), the presence of lymphoplasmacytoid cells (P < .001) and Dutcher bodies (P < .001), increased numbers of mast cells (P < .001), and the MYD88 L265P mutation (P < .001).
LPL can be reliably distinguished from MZL in the bone marrow by using a combination of pathology characteristics. Our findings stress the diagnostic importance of using the combination of the following parameters for a correct LPL diagnosis: paratrabecular infiltration, the presence of lymphoplasmacytoid cells and cells with Dutcher bodies, and an increased number of mast cells in addition to the presence of MYD88 mutation.
淋巴浆细胞淋巴瘤(LPL)和边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL)累及骨髓时的鉴别诊断具有挑战性,因为这两种疾病的组织学和免疫表型存在重叠。我们重新审视了这两种疾病在骨髓中的诊断病理特征。
我们研究了一系列来自59例无髓外受累的华氏巨球蛋白血症患者的骨髓活检标本,以及23例特征明确且累及骨髓的MZL患者的骨髓活检标本。回顾了骨髓活检标本的苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色和免疫过氧化物酶染色切片,以及对穿刺液进行的流式细胞术和经典细胞遗传学检查。对所有样本进行MYD88 L265P突变分析以补充该研究。
LPL与MZL最显著的区别特征为局灶性小梁旁受累(P <.001)、淋巴浆细胞样细胞的存在(P <.001)和杜氏小体(P <.001)、肥大细胞数量增加(P <.001)以及MYD88 L265P突变(P <.001)。
通过综合病理学特征,可在骨髓中将LPL与MZL可靠地区分开来。我们的研究结果强调了联合使用以下参数对正确诊断LPL的重要性:小梁旁浸润、淋巴浆细胞样细胞和含有杜氏小体的细胞的存在、肥大细胞数量增加以及MYD88突变的存在。