Zimmermann Mathias, Steenhuis Pieter, Linssen Jo, Weimann Andreas
Clin Lab. 2015;61(3-4):235-41. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2014.140704.
Since the recent introduction of Sysmex hematology analyzers of the XN-series it can be expected that the values of individual hematological parameters might differ between the new XN and the well-established XE platform. One such parameter is called Neutrophil-Granularity-Intensity or NEUT-GI on the XN-series and NEUT-X on the XE-series. Both parameters are used by clinicians to calculate the Granularity-Index (GI-Index), an important tool to detect hypo- or hypergranulated neutrophils occurring during myelodysplasia or inflammation. The aims of this study were to determine if previously reported reference intervals for NEUT-X can be used for NEUT-GI as well and if the GI-Indices on both analyzer platforms correlate with each other.
NEUT-GI and NEUT-X were assessed in a set of 789 blood samples (n = 543 samples from adult intensive care units and n = 246 samples from adult "blood-healthy" control patients) and the corresponding Granularity-Indices were calculated for all samples using data obtained from XE-5000 and XN-1000 hematology analyzers.
NEUT-GI and NEUT-X correlated significantly with each other (r2: 0.6512; p < 0.0001) with statistically significant higher values for NEUT-GI compared to NEUT-X in the control group (p < 0.0001) as well as in the ICU patients (p < 0.0001). This indicated that previously established reference intervals for NEUT-X cannot be used for NEUT-GI. In contrast, the GI-Indices showed no statistically significant difference between the analyzers in both groups. The GI-Indices were higher in the ICU patients compared to the control group on both analyzer platforms (p < 0.0001), as would be expected.
Our study revealed the emphatic need for a new reference interval for NEUT-GI on the XN platform. The resulting 95% reference intervals were 140.91 - 160.46 channels for NEUT-GI and 129.20 - 142.33 channels for NEUT-X. The GI-Indices showed no significant statistical difference between the XN- and XE-series in both cohorts.
自从最近引入Sysmex XN系列血液分析仪以来,可以预期新的XN系列与成熟的XE平台之间各个血液学参数的值可能会有所不同。其中一个这样的参数在XN系列上称为中性粒细胞颗粒强度(Neutrophil-Granularity-Intensity)或NEUT-GI,在XE系列上称为NEUT-X。临床医生使用这两个参数来计算颗粒指数(GI-Index),这是检测骨髓发育异常或炎症期间出现的低颗粒或高颗粒中性粒细胞的重要工具。本研究的目的是确定先前报道的NEUT-X参考区间是否也可用于NEUT-GI,以及两个分析仪平台上的GI指数是否相互关联。
在一组789份血液样本中评估NEUT-GI和NEUT-X(n = 543份来自成人重症监护病房的样本,n = 246份来自成人“血液健康”对照患者的样本),并使用从XE-5000和XN-1000血液分析仪获得的数据为所有样本计算相应的颗粒指数。
NEUT-GI和NEUT-X彼此显著相关(r2:0.6512;p < 0.0001),在对照组(p < 0.0001)以及ICU患者中(p < 0.0001),NEUT-GI的值在统计学上显著高于NEUT-X。这表明先前建立的NEUT-X参考区间不能用于NEUT-GI。相比之下,两组分析仪之间的GI指数没有统计学上的显著差异。正如预期的那样,在两个分析仪平台上,ICU患者的GI指数均高于对照组(p < 0.0001)。
我们的研究表明,迫切需要为XN平台上的NEUT-GI建立新的参考区间。由此得出的95%参考区间为:NEUT-GI为140.91 - 160.46通道,NEUT-X为129.20 - 142.33通道。在两个队列中,XN系列和XE系列之间的GI指数没有显著的统计学差异。