Suppr超能文献

探索低收入环境下服务整合的可行性:斯威士兰不同生殖健康与艾滋病护理模式的混合方法调查

Exploring the Feasibility of Service Integration in a Low-Income Setting: A Mixed Methods Investigation into Different Models of Reproductive Health and HIV Care in Swaziland.

作者信息

Church Kathryn, Wringe Alison, Lewin Simon, Ploubidis George B, Fakudze Phelele, Mayhew Susannah H

机构信息

Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Global Health Unit, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway; Health Systems Research Unit, Medical Research Council of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 May 15;10(5):e0126144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126144. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Integrating reproductive health (RH) with HIV care is a policy priority in high HIV prevalence settings, despite doubts surrounding its feasibility and varying evidence of effects on health outcomes. The process and outcomes of integrated RH-HIV care were investigated in Swaziland, through a comparative case study of four service models, ranging from fully integrated to fully stand-alone HIV services, selected purposively within one town. A client exit survey (n=602) measured integrated care received and unmet family planning (FP) needs. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the degree of integration per clinic and client demand for services. Logistic regression modelling was used to test the hypothesis that clients at more integrated sites had lower unmet FP needs than clients in a stand-alone site. Qualitative methods included in-depth interviews with clients and providers to explore contextual factors influencing the feasibility of integrated RH-HIV care delivery; data were analysed thematically, combining deductive and inductive approaches. Results demonstrated that clinic models were not as integrated in practice as had been claimed. Fragmentation of HIV care was common. Services accessed per provider were no higher at the more integrated clinics compared to stand-alone models (p>0.05), despite reported demand. While women at more integrated sites received more FP and pregnancy counselling than stand-alone models, they received condoms (a method of choice) less often, and there was no statistical evidence of difference in unmet FP needs by model of care. Multiple contextual factors influenced integration practices, including provider de-skilling within sub-specialist roles; norms of task-oriented routinised HIV care; perceptions of heavy client loads; imbalanced client-provider interactions hindering articulation of RH needs; and provider motivation challenges. Thus, despite institutional support, factors related to the social context of care inhibited provision of fully integrated RH-HIV services in these clinics. Programmes should move beyond simplistic training and equipment provision if integrated care interventions are to be sustained.

摘要

在艾滋病毒高流行地区,将生殖健康(RH)与艾滋病毒护理相结合是一项政策重点,尽管人们对其可行性存在疑虑,且对健康结果影响的证据也各不相同。通过对四种服务模式进行比较案例研究,在斯威士兰调查了生殖健康与艾滋病毒综合护理的过程和结果,这四种服务模式从完全整合到完全独立的艾滋病毒服务,是在一个城镇内有目的地选择的。一项客户出院调查(n = 602)测量了所接受的综合护理以及未满足的计划生育(FP)需求。描述性统计用于评估每个诊所的整合程度以及客户对服务的需求。逻辑回归模型用于检验以下假设:与独立诊所的客户相比,整合程度更高的诊所的客户未满足的计划生育需求更低。定性方法包括对客户和提供者进行深入访谈,以探讨影响生殖健康与艾滋病毒综合护理提供可行性的背景因素;采用演绎和归纳相结合的方法对数据进行主题分析。结果表明,诊所模式在实践中的整合程度不如所宣称的那样。艾滋病毒护理的碎片化很常见。与独立模式相比,整合程度更高的诊所每位提供者提供的服务并不更多(p>0.05),尽管有需求报告。虽然整合程度更高的诊所的女性比独立模式的女性接受了更多的计划生育和怀孕咨询,但她们获得避孕套(一种首选方法)的频率较低,而且没有统计证据表明护理模式在未满足的计划生育需求方面存在差异。多种背景因素影响了整合实践,包括专科角色内提供者技能的退化;以任务为导向的常规艾滋病毒护理规范;对客户负担过重的看法;客户与提供者之间不平衡的互动阻碍了生殖健康需求的表达;以及提供者的动机挑战。因此,尽管有机构支持,但与护理社会背景相关的因素阻碍了这些诊所提供完全整合的生殖健康与艾滋病毒服务。如果要维持综合护理干预措施,项目应超越简单的培训和设备提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8747/4433110/68bed341f123/pone.0126144.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验