Jensen Karin, Kirsch Irving, Odmalm Sara, Kaptchuk Ted J, Ingvar Martin
Program in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215; Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
Program in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 23;112(25):7863-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504567112. Epub 2015 May 15.
Pain reduction and enhancement can be produced by means of conditioning procedures, yet the role of awareness during the acquisition stage of classical conditioning is unknown. We used psychophysical measures to establish whether conditioned analgesic and hyperalgesic responses could be acquired by unseen (subliminally presented) stimuli. A 2 × 2 factorial design, including subliminal/supraliminal exposures of conditioning stimuli (CS) during acquisition/extinction, was used. Results showed significant analgesic and hyperalgesic responses (P < 0.001), and responses were independent of CS awareness, as subliminal/supraliminal cues during acquisition/extinction led to comparable outcomes. The effect was significantly larger for hyperalgesic than analgesic responses (P < 0.001). Results demonstrate that conscious awareness of the CS is not required during either acquisition or extinction of conditioned analgesia or hyperalgesia. Our results support the notion that nonconscious stimuli have a pervasive effect on human brain function and behavior and may affect learning of complex cognitive processes such as psychologically mediated analgesic and hyperalgesic responses.
通过条件作用程序可以实现疼痛减轻和增强,然而在经典条件作用的习得阶段意识所起的作用尚不清楚。我们运用心理物理学方法来确定未被察觉(阈下呈现)的刺激是否能够引发条件性镇痛和痛觉过敏反应。实验采用了2×2析因设计,包括在习得/消退过程中对条件刺激(CS)进行阈下/阈上暴露。结果显示出显著的镇痛和痛觉过敏反应(P < 0.001),并且反应与对CS的意识无关,因为在习得/消退过程中的阈下/阈上线索导致了相似的结果。痛觉过敏反应的效应显著大于镇痛反应(P < 0.001)。结果表明,在条件性镇痛或痛觉过敏的习得或消退过程中,并不需要对CS有清醒的意识。我们的结果支持了这样一种观点,即无意识刺激对人类大脑功能和行为具有广泛影响,并且可能影响诸如心理介导的镇痛和痛觉过敏反应等复杂认知过程的学习。