Millar William T, Hopewell John W, Paddick Ian, Lindquist Christer, Nordströn Håkan, Lidberg Pär, Gårding Jonas
Beatson Oncology Centre, Gartnavel Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Green Templeton College and Particle Therapy Cancer Research Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Phys Med. 2015 Sep;31(6):627-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 May 14.
Radiosurgery (RS) treatment times vary, even for the same prescription dose, due to variations in the collimator size, the number of iso-centres/beams/arcs used and the time gap between each of these exposures. The biologically effective dose (BED) concept, incorporating fast and slow components of repair, was used to show the likely influence of these variables for Gamma Knife patients with Vestibular Schwannomas. Two patients plans were selected, treated with the Model B Gamma Knife, these representing the widest range of treatment variables; iso-centre numbers 3 and 13, overall treatment times 25.4 and 129.6 min, prescription dose 14 Gy. These were compared with 3 cases treated with the Perfexion(®) Gamma Knife. The iso-centre number varied between 11 and 18, treatment time 35.7 - 74.4 min, prescription dose 13 Gy. In the longer Model B Gamma Knife treatment plan the 14 Gy iso-dose was best matched by the 58 Gy2.47 iso-BED line, although higher and lower BED values were associated with regions on the prescription iso-dose. The equivalent value for the shorter treatment was 85 Gy2.47. BED volume histograms showed that a BED of 85 Gy2.47 only covered ∼65% of the target in the plan with the longer overall treatment time. The corresponding BED values for the 3 cases, treated with the Perfexion(®) Gamma Knife, were 59.5, 68.5 and 71.5 Gy2.47. In conclusion BED calculations, taking account of the repair of sublethal damage, may indicate the importance of reporting overall time to reflect the biological effectiveness of the total physical dose applied.
放射外科(RS)治疗时间各不相同,即使对于相同的处方剂量也是如此,这是由于准直器尺寸、使用的等中心/射束/弧的数量以及每次照射之间的时间间隔存在差异。结合快速和慢速修复成分的生物有效剂量(BED)概念,用于显示这些变量对患有前庭神经鞘瘤的伽玛刀患者可能产生的影响。选择了两名使用B型伽玛刀治疗的患者计划,这些计划代表了最广泛的治疗变量范围;等中心数量分别为3和13,总治疗时间分别为25.4分钟和129.6分钟,处方剂量为14 Gy。将这些与3例使用Perfexion(®)伽玛刀治疗的病例进行比较。等中心数量在11至18之间变化,治疗时间为35.7 - 74.4分钟,处方剂量为13 Gy。在较长的B型伽玛刀治疗计划中,14 Gy等剂量线与58 Gy2.47等BED线最匹配,尽管在处方等剂量线上的区域与更高和更低的BED值相关。较短治疗的等效值为85 Gy2.47。BED体积直方图显示,在总治疗时间较长的计划中,85 Gy2.47的BED仅覆盖了靶区的约65%。使用Perfexion(®)伽玛刀治疗的3例病例的相应BED值分别为59.5、68.5和71.5 Gy2.47。总之,考虑到亚致死损伤修复的BED计算可能表明报告总时间以反映所施加的总物理剂量的生物学有效性的重要性。