Suppr超能文献

何时需要双支架技术,对于冠状动脉分叉病变应采用哪种技术?

When is a two-stent technique needed and which technique should then be used for bifurcation coronary lesions?

作者信息

Kim Young-Hak, Lassen Jens Flensted, Hildick-Smith David

机构信息

Cardiology Division, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2015;11 Suppl V:V96-8. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11SVA21.

Abstract

Although the guidelines recommend the provisional one-stent technique as a default technique for bifurcation coronary lesions, there are cases of bifurcations with large side branches (SB), difficult access and with ostial and diffuse disease extending more than 5 mm into the SB, where a two-stent strategy might be the best treatment option. Due to the inherent advantages and disadvantages of each two-stent technique, an appropriate technique should be selected according to each patient's clinical condition, bifurcation morphology and the operator's experience. Good long-term prognosis is most likely ensured by successful performance of each procedural step during the initial stenting.

摘要

尽管指南推荐临时单支架技术作为冠状动脉分叉病变的默认技术,但仍有一些分叉病变,其边支粗大、入路困难,且开口及弥漫性病变向边支延伸超过5mm,此时双支架策略可能是最佳治疗选择。由于每种双支架技术都有其固有的优缺点,应根据每位患者的临床情况、分叉形态及术者经验选择合适的技术。在初始支架置入过程中,成功完成每一步操作最有可能确保良好的长期预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验