Lee Jeon, Finkelstein Joseph
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:458-60.
Consumer sleep tracking devices are widely advertised as effective means to monitor and manage sleep quality and to provide positive effects on overall heath. However objective evidence supporting these claims is not always readily available. The goal of this study was to perform a comprehensive review of available information on six representative sleep tracking devices: BodyMedia FIT, Fitbit Flex, Jawbone UP, Basis Band, Innovative Sleep Solutions SleepTracker, and Zeo Sleep Manager Pro. The review was conducted along the following dimensions: output metrics, theoretical frameworks, systematic evaluation, and FDA clearance. The review identified a critical lack of basic information about the devices: five out of six devices provided no supporting information on their sensor accuracy and four out of six devices provided no information on their output metrics accuracy. Only three devices were found to have related peer-reviewed articles. However in these articles wake detection accuracy was revealed to be quite low and to vary widely (BodyMedia, 49.9±3.6%; Fitbit, 19.8%; Zeo, 78.9% to 83.5%). No supporting evidence on how well tracking devices can help mitigate sleep loss and manage sleep disturbances in practical life was provided.
消费级睡眠追踪设备被广泛宣传为监测和管理睡眠质量以及对整体健康产生积极影响的有效手段。然而,支持这些说法的客观证据并非总是 readily available。本研究的目的是对六种代表性睡眠追踪设备的现有信息进行全面综述:BodyMedia FIT、Fitbit Flex、Jawbone UP、Basis Band、Innovative Sleep Solutions SleepTracker和Zeo Sleep Manager Pro。该综述沿着以下维度进行:输出指标、理论框架、系统评估和美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准。该综述发现这些设备严重缺乏基本信息:六种设备中有五种未提供关于其传感器准确性的支持信息,六种设备中有四种未提供关于其输出指标准确性的信息。仅发现三种设备有相关的同行评审文章。然而,在这些文章中,清醒检测准确性被发现相当低且差异很大(BodyMedia为49.9±3.6%;Fitbit为19.8%;Zeo为78.9%至83.5%)。未提供关于追踪设备在实际生活中如何有效帮助减轻睡眠不足和管理睡眠障碍的支持证据。