Gonzalez-Rothi Elisa J, Lee Kun-Ze, Dale Erica A, Reier Paul J, Mitchell Gordon S, Fuller David D
Department of Physical Therapy College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida;
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan;
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015 Dec 15;119(12):1455-65. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00235.2015. Epub 2015 May 21.
In recent years, it has become clear that brief, repeated presentations of hypoxia [i.e., acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH)] can boost the efficacy of more traditional therapeutic strategies in certain cases of neurologic dysfunction. This hypothesis derives from a series of studies in animal models and human subjects performed over the past 35 yr. In 1980, Millhorn et al. (Millhorn DE, Eldridge FL, Waldrop TG. Respir Physiol 41: 87-103, 1980) showed that electrical stimulation of carotid chemoafferent neurons produced a persistent, serotonin-dependent increase in phrenic motor output that outlasts the stimulus for more than 90 min (i.e., a "respiratory memory"). AIH elicits similar phrenic "long-term facilitation" (LTF) by a mechanism that requires cervical spinal serotonin receptor activation and de novo protein synthesis. From 2003 to present, a series of studies demonstrated that AIH can induce neuroplasticity in the injured spinal cord, causing functional recovery of breathing capacity after cervical spinal injury. Subsequently, it was demonstrated that repeated AIH (rAIH) can induce recovery of limb function, and the functional benefits of rAIH are greatest when paired with task-specific training. Since uncontrolled and/or prolonged intermittent hypoxia can elicit pathophysiology, a challenge of intermittent hypoxia research is to ensure that therapeutic protocols are well below the threshold for pathogenesis. This is possible since many low dose rAIH protocols have induced functional benefits without evidence of pathology. We propose that carefully controlled rAIH is a safe and noninvasive modality that can be paired with other neurorehabilitative strategies including traditional activity-based physical therapy or cell-based therapies such as intraspinal transplantation of neural progenitors.
近年来,有一点已变得很清楚,即在某些神经功能障碍病例中,短暂、反复出现的缺氧[即急性间歇性缺氧(AIH)]能够提高更为传统的治疗策略的疗效。这一假说源自过去35年里在动物模型和人类受试者身上开展的一系列研究。1980年,米尔霍恩等人(米尔霍恩DE、埃尔德里奇FL、沃尔德罗普TG。《呼吸生理学》41: 87 - 103, 1980)表明,电刺激颈动脉化学传入神经元会使膈神经运动输出产生持续的、依赖血清素的增加,这种增加在刺激结束后会持续超过90分钟(即“呼吸记忆”)。AIH通过一种需要激活颈脊髓血清素受体和从头合成蛋白质的机制引发类似的膈神经“长期易化”(LTF)。从2003年至今,一系列研究表明,AIH可诱导损伤脊髓的神经可塑性,导致颈脊髓损伤后呼吸能力的功能恢复。随后,又证明反复AIH(rAIH)可诱导肢体功能恢复,并且当与特定任务训练相结合时,rAIH的功能益处最大。由于不受控制和/或长时间的间歇性缺氧会引发病理生理学变化,间歇性缺氧研究面临的一个挑战是确保治疗方案远低于发病阈值。这是可行的,因为许多低剂量rAIH方案已产生功能益处且无病理迹象。我们提出,仔细控制的rAIH是一种安全且无创的治疗方式,可与其他神经康复策略相结合,包括传统的基于活动的物理治疗或基于细胞的治疗,如脊髓内移植神经祖细胞。