Suppr超能文献

接受长时间机械通气治疗的危重症患者的长期生存:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Long-term survival of critically ill patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA.

Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Jul;3(7):544-53. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00150-2. Epub 2015 May 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prolonged dependence on mechanical ventilation after critical illness is an emerging public health challenge; however, long-term outcomes are incompletely understood. We aimed to systematically analyse long-term survival of critically ill patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library between 1988 and Nov 6, 2013, with no language restrictions, for studies on prolonged mechanical ventilation. We included studies of adult populations treated with mechanical ventilation for more than 14 days, who were admitted to a ventilator weaning unit, or who had a tracheostomy for acute respiratory failure. We abstracted data with a standardised collection template and assessed study quality (ie, risk of bias) using a customised Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We did a stratified analysis based on study setting (eg, acute vs post-acute care hospitals), and used a random-effects model to calculate pooled statistics (proportions with 95% CIs) for all outcomes. We did sensitivity analyses based on study quality (ie, high-quality studies only) and country of origin (USA vs non-USA and USA vs UK). The primary outcome was mortality at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, discharge destination among survivors, successful liberation from mechanical ventilation while in hospital, and mortality at timepoints longer than 1 year.

FINDINGS

Of 6326 studies identified, 402 underwent full manuscript review, and 124 studies from 16 countries met the inclusion criteria. 39 studies reported mortality at 1 year, which was 59% (95% CI 56-62). Among the 29 high-quality studies, the pooled mortality at 1 year was 62% (95% CI 57-67). Pooled mortality at hospital discharge was 29% (95% CI 26-32). However, only 19% (16-24) were discharged to home and only 50% (47-53) were successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation. For studies in post-acute care hospitals, outcomes were worse in the USA than internationally (mortality at 1 year was 73% [95% CI 67-78] in the USA vs 47% [29-65] in non-USA countries; in-hospital mortality was 31% [26-37] vs 18% [14-24]; and liberation from ventilation was 47% [42-51] vs 63% [59-68]; p<0·0001 for all).

INTERPRETATION

Although a high proportion of patients survived to hospital discharge, fewer than half of patients survived beyond 1 year. Future studies should focus on optimum patient selection for prolonged mechanical ventilation and integration of long-term outcome information into clinical decision making.

FUNDING

Cooper University Health Care and Cooper Medical School of Rowan University.

摘要

背景

危重病患者机械通气时间延长是一个新出现的公共卫生挑战;然而,长期预后仍不完全清楚。本研究旨在系统分析接受长时间机械通气治疗的危重病患者的长期生存率。

方法

我们于 1988 年 1 月至 2013 年 11 月 6 日在 PubMed、CINAHL 和 Cochrane Library 中检索了有关长时间机械通气的研究,未设语言限制。纳入的研究对象为接受机械通气治疗超过 14 天的成年患者,他们入住了通气撤机病房,或因急性呼吸衰竭而行气管切开术。我们使用标准化的数据采集模板提取数据,并使用定制的 Newcastle-Ottawa 量表评估研究质量(即偏倚风险)。我们基于研究环境(如急性护理与亚急性/康复护理医院)进行了分层分析,并使用随机效应模型计算所有结局的汇总统计量(比例及其 95%CI)。我们还基于研究质量(即高质量研究)和国家来源(美国与非美国和美国与英国)进行了敏感性分析。主要结局为 1 年时的死亡率。次要结局为院内死亡率、幸存者的出院去向、院内成功撤机以及 1 年以上时间点的死亡率。

结果

在检索到的 6326 篇研究中,有 402 篇进行了全文审查,来自 16 个国家的 124 篇研究符合纳入标准。39 项研究报告了 1 年时的死亡率,为 59%(95%CI 56%-62%)。在 29 项高质量研究中,1 年时的汇总死亡率为 62%(95%CI 57%-67%)。院内出院时的死亡率为 29%(95%CI 26%-32%)。然而,仅有 19%(16%-24%)出院回家,仅有 50%(47%-53%)成功撤机。在亚急性/康复护理医院进行的研究中,美国的结局比国际上差(1 年时的死亡率在美国为 73%(95%CI 67%-78%),而非美国国家为 47%(29%-65%);院内死亡率为 31%(26%-37%),而非美国国家为 18%(14%-24%);以及撤机率为 47%(42%-51%),而非美国国家为 63%(59%-68%);所有差异均<0.0001)。

结论

尽管很大比例的患者存活至出院,但不到一半的患者存活时间超过 1 年。未来的研究应关注对长时间机械通气患者进行最佳的患者选择,并将长期预后信息纳入临床决策。

资助

库珀大学卫生保健和库珀罗文大学医学院。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验