Ochieng Washingtone, Kitawi Rose C, Nzomo Timothy J, Mwatelah Ruth S, Kimulwo Maureen J, Ochieng Dorothy J, Kinyua Joyceline, Lagat Nancy, Onyango Kevin O, Lwembe Raphael M, Mwamburi Mkaya, Ogutu Bernhards R, Oloo Florence A, Aman Rashid
*Center for Research in Therapeutic Sciences and the Institute of Healthcare Management, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Kenya; †Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya; ‡Institute of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases at JKUAT, Nairobi, Kenya; §MCPHS University, Worcester, MA; ‖Center for Global Public Health, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; and ¶African Centre for Clinical Trials, Nairobi, Kenya.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015 Jun 1;69(2):e49-56. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000580.
Universal access to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is still elusive in most developing nations. We asked whether peer support influenced adherence and treatment outcome and if a single viral load (VL) could define treatment failure in a resource-limited setting.
A multicenter longitudinal and cross-sectional survey of VL, CD4 T cells, and adherence in 546 patients receiving HAART for up to 228 months. VL and CD4 counts were determined using m2000 Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay and FACS counters, respectively. Adherence was assessed based on pill count and on self-report.
Of the patients, 55.8%, 22.2%, and 22% had good, fair, and poor adherence, respectively. Adherence, peer support, and regimen, but not HIV disclosure, age, or gender, independently correlated with VL and durability of treatment in a multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). Treatment failure was 35.9% using sequential VL but ranged between 27% and 35% using alternate single VL cross-sectional definitions. More patients failed stavudine (41.2%) than zidovudine (37.4%) or tenofovir (28.8%, P = 0.043) treatment arms. Peer support correlated positively with adherence (χ(2), P < 0.001), with nonadherence being highest in the stavudine arm. VL before the time of regimen switch was comparable between patients switching and not switching treatment. Moreover, 36% of those switching still failed the second-line regimen.
Weak adherence support and inaccessible VL testing threaten to compromise the success of HAART scale-up in Kenya. To hasten antiretroviral therapy monitoring and decision making, we suggest strengthening patient-focused adherence programs, optimizing and aligning regimen to WHO standards, and a single point-of-care VL testing when multiple tests are unavailable.
在大多数发展中国家,普遍获得高效抗逆转录病毒疗法(HAART)仍然难以实现。我们探讨了同伴支持是否会影响依从性和治疗结果,以及在资源有限的环境中,单一病毒载量(VL)是否能够定义治疗失败。
对546例接受HAART治疗长达228个月的患者进行了一项关于VL、CD4 T细胞和依从性的多中心纵向和横断面调查。分别使用m2000雅培实时HIV-1检测法和流式细胞仪测定VL和CD4计数。基于药丸计数和自我报告评估依从性。
患者中,分别有55.8%、22.2%和22%的患者依从性良好、一般和较差。在多变量分析中,依从性、同伴支持和治疗方案,而非HIV披露情况、年龄或性别,与VL和治疗持续性独立相关(P < 0.001)。使用连续VL定义时治疗失败率为35.9%,但使用交替单一VL横断面定义时,失败率在27%至35%之间。接受司他夫定治疗的患者失败率(41.2%)高于齐多夫定(37.4%)或替诺福韦(28.8%,P = 0.043)治疗组。同伴支持与依从性呈正相关(χ(2),P < 0.001),司他夫定治疗组的不依从率最高。在更换治疗方案的患者和未更换治疗方案的患者之间,方案更换前的VL相当。此外,36%更换治疗方案的患者在二线治疗方案中仍然失败。
依从性支持薄弱和无法进行VL检测可能会危及肯尼亚扩大HAART规模的成功。为了加快抗逆转录病毒治疗监测和决策,我们建议加强以患者为中心的依从性项目,根据世界卫生组织标准优化和调整治疗方案,以及在无法进行多次检测时进行即时单点VL检测。