Nebergall Audrey K, Rader Kevin, Palm Henrik, Malchau Henrik, Greene Meridith E
a 1 Harris Orthopaedic Laboratory , Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
b 2 Biostatistics Department , Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Acta Orthop. 2015;86(5):563-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1054255. Epub 2015 May 26.
In traditional radiostereometric analysis (RSA), 1 segment defines both the acetabular shell and the polyethylene liner. However, inserting beads into the polyethylene liner permits employment of the shell and liner as 2 separate segments, enabling distinct analysis of the precision of 3 measurement methods in determining femoral head penetration and shell migration.
The UmRSA program was used to analyze the double examinations of 51 hips to determine if there was a difference in using the shell-only segment, the liner-only segment, or the shell + liner segment to measure wear and acetabular cup stability. The standard deviation multiplied by the critical value (from a t distribution) established the precision of each method.
Due to the imprecision of the automated edge detection, the shell-only method was least desirable. The shell + liner and liner-only methods had a precision of 0.115 mm and 0.086 mm, respectively, when measuring head penetration. For shell migration, the shell + liner had a precision of 0.108 mm, which was better than the precision of the shell-only method. In both the penetration and migration analyses, the shell + liner condition number was statistically significantly lower and the bead count was significantly higher than for the other methods.
Insertion of beads in the polyethylene improves the precision of femoral head penetration and shell migration measurements. A greater dispersion and number of beads when combining the liner with the shell generated more reliable results in both analyses, by engaging a larger portion of the radiograph.
在传统的放射立体测量分析(RSA)中,1个节段同时定义髋臼杯和聚乙烯内衬。然而,在聚乙烯内衬中植入珠子可将髋臼杯和内衬作为2个独立节段使用,从而能够分别分析3种测量方法在确定股骨头穿透和髋臼杯移位方面的精度。
使用UmRSA程序分析51例髋关节的两次检查结果,以确定仅使用髋臼杯节段、仅使用内衬节段或髋臼杯+内衬节段测量磨损和髋臼杯稳定性时是否存在差异。标准偏差乘以临界值(来自t分布)确定每种方法的精度。
由于自动边缘检测的不精确性,仅使用髋臼杯的方法最不理想。测量股骨头穿透时,髋臼杯+内衬和仅使用内衬的方法的精度分别为0.115 mm和0.086 mm。对于髋臼杯移位,髋臼杯+内衬的精度为0.108 mm,优于仅使用髋臼杯的方法。在穿透和移位分析中,髋臼杯+内衬的条件数在统计学上显著更低,且珠子计数显著高于其他方法。
在聚乙烯内衬中植入珠子可提高股骨头穿透和髋臼杯移位测量的精度。在两种分析中,将内衬与髋臼杯结合时,珠子的更大分散度和数量通过覆盖更大比例的X线片产生了更可靠的结果。