Jo Chris Hyunchul, Shin Ji Sun, Shin Won Hyoung, Lee Seung Yeon, Yoon Kang Sup, Shin Sue
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2102-10. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587081. Epub 2015 May 26.
Two main questions about the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for regeneration purposes are its effect on the speed of healing and the quality of healing. Despite recent numerous studies, evidence is still lacking in this area, especially in a representative patient population with medium to large rotator cuff tears.
To assess the efficacy of PRP augmentation on the speed and quality of healing in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair for medium to large rotator cuff tears.
Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
A total of 74 patients scheduled for arthroscopic repair of medium to large rotator cuff tears were randomly assigned to undergo either PRP-augmented repair (PRP group) or conventional repair (conventional group). In the PRP group, 3 PRP gels (3 × 3 mL) were applied to each patient between the torn end and the greater tuberosity. The primary outcome was the Constant score at 3 months after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, overall satisfaction and function, functional scores, retear rate, and change in the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the supraspinatus muscle.
There was no difference between the 2 groups in the Constant score at 3 months (P > .05). The 2 groups had similar results on the VAS for pain, ROM, muscle strength, overall satisfaction and function, and other functional scores (all P > .05) except for the VAS for worst pain (P = .043). The retear rate of the PRP group (3.0%) was significantly lower than that of the conventional group (20.0%) (P = .032). The change in 1-year postoperative and immediately postoperative CSAs was significantly different between the 2 groups: -36.76 ± 45.31 mm(2) in the PRP group versus -67.47 ± 47.26 mm(2) in the conventional group (P = .014).
Compared with repairs without PRP augmentation, the current PRP preparation and application methods for medium to large rotator cuff repairs significantly improved the quality, as evidenced by a decreased retear rate and increased CSA of the supraspinatus, but not the speed of healing. However, further studies may be needed to investigate the effects of PRP on the speed of healing without risking the quality.
关于使用富血小板血浆(PRP)促进组织再生,有两个主要问题,即其对愈合速度和愈合质量的影响。尽管近期有大量研究,但该领域仍缺乏证据,尤其是在有中到大型肩袖撕裂的代表性患者群体中。
评估PRP增强对中到大型肩袖撕裂患者关节镜修复术后愈合速度和质量的疗效。
随机对照试验;证据等级,1级。
总共74例计划接受中到大型肩袖撕裂关节镜修复的患者被随机分配接受PRP增强修复(PRP组)或传统修复(传统组)。在PRP组中,向每位患者的撕裂端与大结节之间应用3剂PRP凝胶(3×3 mL)。主要结局是术后3个月的Constant评分。次要结局指标包括疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、活动范围(ROM)、肌肉力量、总体满意度和功能、功能评分、再撕裂率以及冈上肌横截面积(CSA)的变化。
两组术后3个月的Constant评分无差异(P>0.05)。除最严重疼痛的VAS评分外(P = 0.043),两组在疼痛VAS评分、ROM、肌肉力量、总体满意度和功能以及其他功能评分方面结果相似(均P>0.05)。PRP组的再撕裂率(3.0%)显著低于传统组(20.0%)(P = 0.032)。两组术后1年与术后即刻CSA的变化有显著差异:PRP组为-36.76±45.31 mm²,传统组为-67.47±47.26 mm²(P = 0.014)。
与未使用PRP增强的修复相比,目前用于中到大型肩袖修复的PRP制备和应用方法显著改善了愈合质量,表现为再撕裂率降低和冈上肌CSA增加,但未改善愈合速度。然而,可能需要进一步研究来探讨PRP对愈合速度的影响而不影响愈合质量。