Suppr超能文献

美观型和半美观型自锁托槽摩擦阻力的比较

Comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets.

作者信息

Kannan M S, Murali R V, Kishorekumar S, Gnanashanmugam K, Jayanth V

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S116-20. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.155852.

Abstract

AIM

The frictional resistance encountered during sliding mechanics has been well established in the orthodontic literature, and it consists of complex interactions between the bracket, archwire, and method of ligation the claim of reduced friction with self-ligating brackets is often cited as a primary advantage over conventional brackets. This study was done to compare and evaluate the frictional forces generated between fully esthetic brackets and semi-aesthetic self-ligating brackets, which are of passive form and SEM (scanning electron microscope) study of the Brackets after Frictional evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two types of self-ligating esthetic brackets, Damon clear (Ormco) made of fully ceramic and Opal (Ultradent Products, USA) and, Two types of self-ligating semi-esthetic brackets, Clarity SL (3M Unitek) and Damon 3 (Ormco) both of which are made of ceramic with metal slot. Arch wires with different dimensions and quality 17 × 25, 19 × 25 Titanium Molybdenum Alloy (TMA) and 17 × 25, 19 × 25 stainless steel that came from plain strands of wire were used for frictional comparison test. The brackets used in this study had 0.022 × 0.028 inch slot.

RESULTS

The statistical tests showed significantly smaller amount of kinetic frictional forces is generated by Damon 3 (semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets). For each wire used, Damon 3 displayed significantly lower frictional forces (P ≤ 0.05) than any of the self-ligating system, followed by Opal (fully esthetic self-ligating brackets) which generated smaller amount of frictional forces but relatively on the higher side when compared with Damon 3. Damon clear (fully esthetic self-ligating brackets) generated the maximum amount of kinetic forces with all types of wire dimensions and properties when compared to the other three types of self-ligating system. Clarity SL (semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets) generated smaller amount of frictional forces when compared with Damon clear and relatively higher amount of frictional forces when compared to Opal and Damon 3.

摘要

目的

滑动力学过程中遇到的摩擦阻力在正畸学文献中已有充分记载,它由托槽、弓丝和结扎方法之间的复杂相互作用组成。自结扎托槽摩擦力减小的说法常被视为相对于传统托槽的主要优势。本研究旨在比较和评估全美观托槽与半美观自结扎托槽(均为被动形式)之间产生的摩擦力,并在摩擦评估后对托槽进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)研究。

材料与方法

两种自结扎美观托槽,全陶瓷材质的Damon clear(奥美科)和Opal(美国Ultradent Products公司);两种自结扎半美观托槽,Clarity SL(3M Unitek公司)和Damon 3(奥美科),二者均为带金属槽沟的陶瓷托槽。使用不同尺寸和材质的弓丝(17×25、19×25的钛钼合金(TMA)以及17×25、19×25的不锈钢材质,均为普通单股丝)进行摩擦比较试验。本研究中使用的托槽槽沟尺寸为0.022×0.028英寸。

结果

统计测试表明,Damon 3(半美观自结扎托槽)产生的动摩擦力显著更小。对于每种使用的弓丝,Damon 3表现出的摩擦力均显著低于任何一种自结扎系统(P≤0.05),其次是Opal(全美观自结扎托槽),其产生的摩擦力较小,但与Damon 3相比相对较高。与其他三种自结扎系统相比,Damon clear(全美观自结扎托槽)在所有弓丝尺寸和性能下产生的动摩擦力最大。Clarity SL(半美观自结扎托槽)与Damon clear相比产生的摩擦力较小,与Opal和Damon 3相比产生的摩擦力相对较大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8759/4439647/37e926439df2/JPBS-7-116-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验