Menary Kyle R, Corbin William R, Leeman Robert F, Fucito Lisa M, Toll Benjamin A, DeMartini Kelly, O'Malley Stephanie S
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Jul;39(7):1267-74. doi: 10.1111/acer.12762. Epub 2015 May 29.
Although drinking for tension reduction has long been posited as a risk factor for alcohol-related problems, studies investigating anxiety in relation to risk for alcohol problems have returned inconsistent results, leading researchers to search for potential moderators. Negative urgency (the tendency to become behaviorally dysregulated when experiencing negative affect) is a potential moderator of theoretical interest because it may increase risk for alcohol problems among those high in negative affect. This study tested a cross-sectional mediated moderation hypothesis whereby an interactive effect of anxiety and negative urgency on alcohol problems is mediated through coping-related drinking motives.
The study utilized baseline data from a hazardously drinking sample of young adults (N = 193) evaluated for participation in a randomized controlled trial of naltrexone and motivational interviewing for drinking reduction.
The direct effect of anxiety on physiological dependence symptoms was moderated by negative urgency such that the positive association between anxiety and physiological dependence symptoms became stronger as negative urgency increased. Indirect effects of anxiety and negative urgency on alcohol problems (operating through coping motives) were also observed.
Although results of the current cross-sectional study require replication using longitudinal data, the findings suggest that the simultaneous presence of anxiety and negative urgency may be an important indicator of risk for alcohol use disorders via both direct interactive effects and indirect additive effects operating through coping motives. These findings have potentially important implications for prevention/intervention efforts for individuals who become disinhibited in the context of negative emotional states.
尽管长期以来人们一直认为通过饮酒来缓解紧张是酒精相关问题的一个风险因素,但研究焦虑与酒精问题风险之间关系的结果并不一致,这促使研究人员寻找潜在的调节因素。消极紧迫性(在经历负面情绪时行为失调的倾向)是一个具有理论意义的潜在调节因素,因为它可能会增加那些高消极情绪者出现酒精问题的风险。本研究检验了一个横断面中介调节假设,即焦虑和消极紧迫性对酒精问题的交互作用是通过与应对相关的饮酒动机来介导的。
该研究利用了来自一个有危险饮酒行为的年轻成人样本(N = 193)的基线数据,这些样本被评估是否参与一项关于纳曲酮和动机访谈以减少饮酒的随机对照试验。
消极紧迫性调节了焦虑对生理依赖症状的直接效应,使得随着消极紧迫性的增加,焦虑与生理依赖症状之间的正相关变得更强。还观察到焦虑和消极紧迫性对酒精问题的间接效应(通过应对动机起作用)。
尽管当前横断面研究的结果需要使用纵向数据进行重复验证,但研究结果表明,焦虑和消极紧迫性同时存在可能是酒精使用障碍风险的一个重要指标,这是通过直接交互效应以及通过应对动机起作用的间接累加效应实现的。这些发现对于针对在负面情绪状态下出现行为失控的个体的预防/干预工作可能具有重要意义。