Outcome in TAVI patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis not fulfilling PARTNER study inclusion criteria.

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has rapidly evolved to the standard-of-care for inoperable patients with severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis, and to an alternative treatment option for high-risk patients. However, the randomized PARTNER trial excluded patients with conditions frequently encountered in daily clinical practice.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2011, 467 high-risk patients, who underwent transfemoral TAVI (Edwards Sapien n = 166; Medtronic CoreValve n = 301) at two German centers were divided into a "PARTNER-like" (n = 227) and a "Real-World" cohort (n = 240), based on the original PARTNER trial in- and exclusion criteria. Differences in 30-day and 2-year mortality and morbidity were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 80 ± 8 years with a logistic EuroSCORE of 22 ± 16%. The most frequent exclusion criteria were previous PCI (15.4%), prior valve surgery (13.7%), chronic renal failure (12.0%), and severe mitral regurgitation (10.8%). Despite significant differences in baseline data, estimated perioperative mortality in terms of STS and logistic EuroScore was identical between both groups. However, patients in the "Real-World" cohort had a non-significant trend towards a higher 30-day mortality (10.0% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.088) and a significantly higher 2-year mortality (23.3% vs. 14.5%, P = 0.016) compared with patients of the "PARTNER-like" cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patients meeting PARTNER study exclusion criteria had an acceptable outcome at 30 days and 2 years, however, with significant differences to "PARTNER-like" patients. Still, our results indicate that also real-life patients with relevant comorbidities, who would have been excluded from the randomized PARTNER trials, benefit from TAVI with acceptable short- and long-term outcome.