Suppr超能文献

儿童肾结石“迷你”经皮肾镜取石术的术后结果。一项单中心研究。

Outcomes following 'mini' percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi in children. A single-centre study.

作者信息

Brodie K E, Lane V A, Lee T W J, Roberts J P, Raghavan A, Hughes D, Godbole P P

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Urology, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TH, UK.

Sheffield University Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.

出版信息

J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Jun;11(3):120.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.09.008. Epub 2015 Mar 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective review was undertaken to identify the postoperative outcomes of children undergoing 'mini' percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) at a single institution.

OBJECTIVE

Outcomes measured included: percentage of stone clearance, postoperative analgesia requirements, the need for intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion, length of stay and morbidity.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 46 patients were reviewed over a two-and-a-half-year period; the mean age was 7.3 years (range: 1-16 years). The MPCNL was performed with a radiological-guided peripheral puncture, followed by dilatation of the nephrostomy tract to a maximum Amplatz sheath size of 16-French; an 11-French nephroscope was used. Stone disintegration was achieved either with pneumatic or laser lithotripsy.

RESULTS

Complete stone clearance was achieved in 35/46 children (76%). The remaining 11 children had a stone clearance rate of over 80%. No patients required intraoperative/postoperative blood transfusion. A total of 39% of patients were managed on simple/non-opiate based analgesia, with 54% requiring opioid analgesia postoperatively for less than 24 h. There were no procedure-related complications and no mortalities. The mean length of stay was 2.24 days.

DISCUSSION

The management of urolithiasis can be challenging in children. The use of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, is becoming increasingly popular in the treatment of paediatric urolithiasis. The stone clearance rate in children undergoing standard PCNL, has been reported to be 50-98% in the literature [1,2,3,4]. Samad et al. [2] in 2006, reported their experience in 188 consecutive PCNLs, using a 17Fr or 26Fr nephroscope. Their largest sub group included children aged >5-16 yrs. Within this group, 57% were treated with a 17Fr nephroscope and 43% with the 26Fr nephroscope, achieving stone clearance of only 47% with PCNL monotherapy. In this group the transfusion rate was 3% [2]. Badawy et al., reported their experience of 60 children in 1999, using a 26 or 28Fr Amplatz sheath. They reported an 83.3% stone clearance with single session PCNL, with only one procedure being abandoned due to intraoperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion [3]. In 2007, Bilen et al. reported their experience and compared the use of 26Fr, 20Fr and 14Fr (mini) PCNL. Stone size, previous surgery and the mean haemoglobin drop postoperatively did not change between the groups, however the blood transfusion rate was higher in the 26Fr and 20Fr Amplatz sheath groups. The stone clearance was highest in the 'mini PCNL' group at 90%, compared to 69.5% in the 26Fr and 80% in the 20Fr group [4]. MPCNL has become increasingly popular over recent years, with stone clearance reported as 80-85% [5-7] following a single session of MPCNL as monotherapy. In 2012, Yan et al. reported 85.2% stone clearance with mini PCNL monotherapy (tract size 14-16Fr), with no children requiring blood transfusion [6]. Zeng et al. reported their experience of 331 renal units in children, with stone clearance rates reaching 80.4% and a blood transfusion rate of 3.1% [8]. In our centre, we do not perform postoperative haemoglobin levels as a matter of routine and any investigations are performed on an intention to treat principle. Bilen et al. reported no blood transfusions being required in their cohort of patients undergoing MPCNL [4] and this is supported by Yan et al. [6].

CONCLUSION

Mini PCNL is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of paediatric renal stones. In the present series, all children achieved greater than 80% stone clearance, none received a blood transfusion (intra/postoperatively) and there were no mortalities. Postoperative pain was managed with simple analgesia in 39%; however, the majority required opiate analgesia for less than 24 hours.

摘要

引言

本回顾性研究旨在确定在单一机构接受“迷你”经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)的儿童的术后结果。

目的

测量的结果包括:结石清除率、术后镇痛需求、术中或术后输血需求、住院时间和发病率。

研究设计

在两年半的时间里共对46例患者进行了回顾;平均年龄为7.3岁(范围:1 - 16岁)。MPCNL采用放射引导下的外周穿刺进行,随后将肾造瘘通道扩张至最大16法式的安普瑞兹鞘尺寸;使用11法式肾镜。通过气压弹道或激光碎石实现结石粉碎。

结果

46例儿童中有35例(76%)实现了结石完全清除。其余11名儿童的结石清除率超过80%。无患者需要术中/术后输血。39%的患者采用简单/非阿片类镇痛治疗,54%的患者术后需要阿片类镇痛少于24小时。无与手术相关的并发症和死亡病例。平均住院时间为2.24天。

讨论

儿童尿石症的治疗具有挑战性。经皮肾镜取石术在儿童尿石症治疗中的应用越来越广泛。文献报道,接受标准经皮肾镜取石术的儿童结石清除率为50 - 98%[1,2,3,4]。2006年,萨马德等人[2]报告了他们对188例连续经皮肾镜取石术的经验,使用17法式或26法式肾镜。他们最大的亚组包括年龄>5 - 16岁的儿童。在该组中,57%的患者使用17法式肾镜治疗,43%的患者使用26法式肾镜治疗,经皮肾镜取石术单一疗法的结石清除率仅为47%。该组的输血率为3%[2]。1999年,巴达维等人报告了他们对60例儿童的经验,使用26或28法式安普瑞兹鞘。他们报告单次经皮肾镜取石术的结石清除率为83.3%,仅1例手术因术中出血需要输血而放弃[3]。2007年,比伦等人报告了他们的经验并比较了26法式、20法式和14法式(迷你)经皮肾镜取石术的使用情况。各组之间结石大小、既往手术情况和术后平均血红蛋白下降情况没有变化,然而,26法式和20法式安普瑞兹鞘组的输血率更高。“迷你经皮肾镜取石术”组的结石清除率最高,为90%,相比之下,26法式组为69.5%,20法式组为80%[4]。近年来,MPCNL越来越受欢迎,单次MPCNL单一疗法后的结石清除率报告为80 - 85%[5 - 7]。2012年,严等人报告迷你经皮肾镜取石术单一疗法(通道尺寸14 - 16法式)的结石清除率为85.2%,无儿童需要输血[6]。曾等人报告了他们对331个儿童肾单位的经验,结石清除率达到80.4%,输血率为3.1%[8]。在我们中心,我们通常不常规检测术后血红蛋白水平,任何检查均按照意向性治疗原则进行。比伦等人报告他们接受MPCNL治疗的患者队列中无需输血[4],严等人[6]也支持这一点。

结论

迷你经皮肾镜取石术是治疗儿童肾结石的一种有效且安全的手术。在本系列研究中,所有儿童的结石清除率均超过80%,无一例接受(术中/术后)输血,且无死亡病例。39%的患者术后疼痛通过简单镇痛得到控制;然而,大多数患者需要阿片类镇痛少于24小时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验