Zoremba Martin, Kratz Thomas, Dette Frank, Wulf Hinnerk, Steinfeldt Thorsten, Wiesmann Thomas
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, 35033 Marburg, Germany.
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, 35033 Marburg, Germany ; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinique Bénigne Joly, 21240 Talant, France.
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:325012. doi: 10.1155/2015/325012. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
After shoulder surgery performed in patients with interscalene nerve block (without general anesthesia), fast track capability and postoperative pain management in the PACU are improved compared with general anesthesia alone. However, it is not known if these evidence-based benefits still exist when the interscalene block is combined with general anesthesia.
We retrospectively analyzed a prospective cohort data set of 159 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy with general anesthesia alone (n = 60) or combined with an interscalene nerve block catheter (n = 99) for fast track capability time. Moreover, comparisons were made for VAS scores, analgesic consumption in the PACU, pain management, and lung function measurements.
The groups did not differ in mean time to fast track capability (22 versus 22 min). Opioid consumption in PACU was significantly less in the interscalene group, who had significantly better VAS scores during PACU stay. Patients receiving interscalene blockade had a significantly impaired lung function postoperatively, although this did not affect postoperative recovery and had no impact on PACU times.
The addition of interscalene block to general anesthesia for shoulder arthroscopy did not enhance fast track capability. Pain management and VAS scores were improved in the interscalene nerve block group.
在接受斜角肌间神经阻滞(无全身麻醉)的患者中进行肩部手术后,与单纯全身麻醉相比,术后恢复室(PACU)的快速康复能力和术后疼痛管理得到改善。然而,当斜角肌间阻滞与全身麻醉联合使用时,这些循证获益是否仍然存在尚不清楚。
我们回顾性分析了159例接受肩部关节镜手术患者的前瞻性队列数据集,这些患者分别单纯接受全身麻醉(n = 60)或联合斜角肌间神经阻滞导管(n = 99)以评估快速康复能力时间。此外,还对视觉模拟评分(VAS)、PACU中的镇痛药物消耗量、疼痛管理和肺功能测量进行了比较。
两组在达到快速康复能力的平均时间上无差异(22分钟对22分钟)。斜角肌间神经阻滞组在PACU中的阿片类药物消耗量显著较少,且在PACU停留期间的VAS评分显著更好。接受斜角肌间神经阻滞的患者术后肺功能明显受损,尽管这并未影响术后恢复,也未对PACU停留时间产生影响。
在肩部关节镜手术的全身麻醉中添加斜角肌间神经阻滞并未提高快速康复能力。斜角肌间神经阻滞组的疼痛管理和VAS评分得到改善。