Clemes Stacy A, Barber Sally E, Bingham Daniel D, Ridgers Nicola D, Fletcher Elly, Pearson Natalie, Salmon Jo, Dunstan David W
School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK NIHR Leicester-Loughborough Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity, Biomedical Research Unit, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.
Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Sep;38(3):526-533. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv084. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
This research examined the influence of sit-to-stand desks on classroom sitting time in primary school children.
Pilot controlled trials with similar intervention strategies were conducted in primary schools in Melbourne, Australia, and Bradford, UK. Sit-to-stand desks replaced all standard desks in the Australian intervention classroom. Six sit-to-stand desks replaced a bank of standard desks in the UK intervention classroom. Children were exposed to the sit-to-stand desks for 9-10 weeks. Control classrooms retained their normal seated desks. Classroom sitting time was measured at baseline and follow-up using the activPAL3 inclinometer.
Thirty UK and 44 Australian children provided valid activPAL data at baseline and follow-up. The proportion of time spent sitting in class decreased significantly at follow-up in both intervention groups (UK: -9.8 ± 16.5% [-52.4 ± 66.6 min/day]; Australian: -9.4 ± 10% [-43.7 ± 29.9 min/day]). No significant changes in classroom sitting time were observed in the UK control group, while a significant reduction was observed in the Australian control group (-5.9 ± 11.7% [-28.2 ± 28.3 min/day]).
Irrespective of implementation, incorporating sit-to-stand desks into classrooms appears to be an effective way of reducing classroom sitting in this diverse sample of children. Longer term efficacy trials are needed to determine effects on children's health and learning.
本研究探讨了升降式课桌对小学生课堂久坐时间的影响。
在澳大利亚墨尔本和英国布拉德福德的小学开展了具有相似干预策略的试点对照试验。在澳大利亚的干预教室中,升降式课桌取代了所有标准课桌。在英国的干预教室中,六张升降式课桌取代了一排标准课桌。让孩子们使用升降式课桌9至10周。对照教室保留其常规的座椅式课桌。使用activPAL3倾角仪在基线和随访时测量课堂久坐时间。
30名英国儿童和44名澳大利亚儿童在基线和随访时提供了有效的activPAL数据。两个干预组在随访时课堂久坐时间的比例均显著下降(英国:-9.8±16.5%[-52.4±66.6分钟/天];澳大利亚:-9.4±10%[-43.7±29.9分钟/天])。英国对照组的课堂久坐时间未观察到显著变化,而澳大利亚对照组观察到显著减少(-5.9±11.7%[-28.2±28.3分钟/天])。
无论实施方式如何,在教室中引入升降式课桌似乎是减少不同样本儿童课堂久坐时间的有效方法。需要进行长期疗效试验以确定对儿童健康和学习的影响。