Drewry Lisa L, Sibley L David
Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
mBio. 2015 Jun 16;6(3):e00557. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00557-15.
Apicomplexan parasites actively invade host cells using a mechanism predicted to be powered by a parasite actin-dependent myosin motor. In the model apicomplexan Toxoplasma gondii, inducible knockout of the actin gene, ACT1, was recently demonstrated to limit but not completely abolish invasion. This observation has led to the provocative suggestion that T. gondii possesses alternative, ACT1-independent invasion pathways. Here, we dissected the residual invasive ability of Δact1 parasites. Surprisingly, we were able to detect residual ACT1 protein in inducible Δact1 parasites as long as 5 days after ACT1 deletion. We further found that the longer Δact1 parasites were propagated after ACT1 deletion, the more severe an invasion defect was observed. Both findings are consistent with the quantity of residual ACT1 retained in Δact1 parasites being responsible for their invasive ability. Furthermore, invasion by the Δact1 parasites was also sensitive to the actin polymerization inhibitor cytochalasin D. Finally, there was no clear defect in attachment to host cells or moving junction formation by Δact1 parasites. However, Δact1 parasites often exhibited delayed entry into host cells, suggesting a defect specific to the penetration stage of invasion. Overall, our results support a model where residual ACT1 protein retained in inducible Δact1 parasites facilitates their limited invasive ability and confirm that parasite actin is essential for efficient penetration into host cells during invasion.
The prevailing model for apicomplexan invasion has recently been suggested to require major revision, based on studies where core components of the invasion machinery were genetically disrupted using a Cre-Lox-based inducible knockout system. For the myosin component of the motor thought to power invasion, an alternative parasite myosin was recently demonstrated to functionally compensate for loss of the primary myosin involved in invasion. Here, we highlight a second mechanism that can account for the surprising ability of parasites to invade after genetic disruption of core invasion machinery. Specifically, residual actin protein present in inducible knockout parasites appears able to support their limited invasion of host cells. Our results have important implications for the interpretation of the apicomplexan invasion model and also highlight significant considerations when analyzing the phenotypes of inducible knockout parasites generated using Cre-Lox technology.
顶复门寄生虫利用一种预计由寄生虫肌动蛋白依赖性肌球蛋白驱动的机制主动侵入宿主细胞。在顶复门模式生物刚地弓形虫中,最近证实肌动蛋白基因ACT1的诱导性敲除会限制但不会完全消除入侵。这一观察结果引发了一个具有启发性的观点,即刚地弓形虫拥有替代的、不依赖ACT1的入侵途径。在这里,我们剖析了Δact1寄生虫的残余入侵能力。令人惊讶的是,我们能够在ACT1缺失后长达5天的诱导性Δact1寄生虫中检测到残余的ACT1蛋白。我们进一步发现,Δact1寄生虫在ACT1缺失后传代的时间越长,观察到的入侵缺陷就越严重。这两个发现都与Δact1寄生虫中保留的残余ACT1数量决定其入侵能力一致。此外,Δact1寄生虫的入侵对肌动蛋白聚合抑制剂细胞松弛素D也敏感。最后,Δact1寄生虫在附着于宿主细胞或形成移动连接方面没有明显缺陷。然而,Δact1寄生虫进入宿主细胞的过程常常延迟,这表明在入侵的穿透阶段存在特定缺陷。总体而言,我们的结果支持这样一个模型,即诱导性Δact1寄生虫中保留的残余ACT1蛋白促进了它们有限的入侵能力,并证实寄生虫肌动蛋白对于入侵期间有效穿透宿主细胞至关重要。
基于使用基于Cre-Lox的诱导性敲除系统对入侵机制的核心成分进行基因破坏的研究,最近有人提出顶复门入侵的主流模型需要重大修订。对于被认为驱动入侵的肌球蛋白成分,最近证实一种替代的寄生虫肌球蛋白在功能上可以补偿参与入侵的主要肌球蛋白的缺失。在这里,我们强调了第二种机制,该机制可以解释寄生虫在核心入侵机制基因破坏后仍具有惊人入侵能力的原因。具体而言,诱导性敲除寄生虫中存在的残余肌动蛋白似乎能够支持它们对宿主细胞的有限入侵。我们的结果对顶复门入侵模型的解释具有重要意义,同时也突出了在分析使用Cre-Lox技术产生的诱导性敲除寄生虫的表型时需要考虑的重要因素。