Suppr超能文献

临床检验科学政策与实践中的自主性与隐私性

Autonomy and Privacy in Clinical Laboratory Science Policy and Practice.

作者信息

Leibach Elizabeth Kenimer

出版信息

Clin Lab Sci. 2014 Fall;27(4):222-30.

Abstract

Rapid advancements in diagnostic technologies coupled with growth in testing options and choices mandate the development of evidence-based testing algorithms linked to the care paths of the major chronic diseases and health challenges encountered most frequently. As care paths are evaluated, patient/consumers become partners in healthcare delivery. Clinical laboratory scientists find themselves firmly embedded in both quality improvement and clinical research with an urgent need to translate clinical laboratory information into knowledge required by practitioners and patient/consumers alike. To implement this patient-centered care approach in clinical laboratory science, practitioners must understand their roles in (1) protecting patient/consumer autonomy in the healthcare informed consent process and (2) assuring patient/consumer privacy and confidentiality while blending quality improvement study findings with protected health information. A literature review, describing the current ethical environment, supports a consultative role for clinical laboratory scientists in the clinical decision-making process and suggests guidance for policy and practice regarding the principle of autonomy and its associated operational characteristics: informed consent and privacy.

摘要

诊断技术的快速进步,加上检测选项和选择的增加,要求开发与最常见的主要慢性病和健康挑战的护理路径相关的循证检测算法。随着护理路径的评估,患者/消费者成为医疗服务的合作伙伴。临床实验室科学家发现自己坚定地融入质量改进和临床研究之中,迫切需要将临床实验室信息转化为从业者和患者/消费者所需的知识。为了在临床检验科学中实施这种以患者为中心的护理方法,从业者必须了解他们在以下方面的作用:(1)在医疗知情同意过程中保护患者/消费者的自主权;(2)确保患者/消费者的隐私和保密,同时将质量改进研究结果与受保护的健康信息相结合。一篇描述当前伦理环境的文献综述支持临床实验室科学家在临床决策过程中发挥咨询作用,并就自主权原则及其相关操作特征(知情同意和隐私)提出政策和实践指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验