Kosloff Thomas M, Elton David, Tao Jiang, Bannister Wade M
Optum Health - Clinical Programs at United Health Group, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA.
Optum Health - Clinical Analytics at United Health Group, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA.
Chiropr Man Therap. 2015 Jun 16;23:19. doi: 10.1186/s12998-015-0063-x. eCollection 2015.
There is controversy surrounding the risk of manipulation, which is often used by chiropractors, with respect to its association with vertebrobasilar artery system (VBA) stroke. The objective of this study was to compare the associations between chiropractic care and VBA stroke with recent primary care physician (PCP) care and VBA stroke.
The study design was a case-control study of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage (MA) health plan members in the U.S. population between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2013. Administrative data were used to identify exposures to chiropractic and PCP care. Separate analyses using conditional logistic regression were conducted for the commercially insured and the MA populations. The analysis of the commercial population was further stratified by age (<45 years; ≥45 years). Odds ratios were calculated to measure associations for different hazard periods. A secondary descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the relevance of using chiropractic visits as a proxy for exposure to manipulative treatment.
There were a total of 1,829 VBA stroke cases (1,159 - commercial; 670 - MA). The findings showed no significant association between chiropractic visits and VBA stroke for either population or for samples stratified by age. In both commercial and MA populations, there was a significant association between PCP visits and VBA stroke incidence regardless of length of hazard period. The results were similar for age-stratified samples. The findings of the secondary analysis showed that chiropractic visits did not report the inclusion of manipulation in almost one third of stroke cases in the commercial population and in only 1 of 2 cases of the MA cohort.
We found no significant association between exposure to chiropractic care and the risk of VBA stroke. We conclude that manipulation is an unlikely cause of VBA stroke. The positive association between PCP visits and VBA stroke is most likely due to patient decisions to seek care for the symptoms (headache and neck pain) of arterial dissection. We further conclude that using chiropractic visits as a measure of exposure to manipulation may result in unreliable estimates of the strength of association with the occurrence of VBA stroke.
脊椎按摩疗法中常用的手法操作与椎基底动脉系统(VBA)中风的关联存在争议。本研究的目的是比较脊椎按摩治疗与VBA中风的关联以及近期初级保健医生(PCP)治疗与VBA中风的关联。
本研究设计为一项病例对照研究,研究对象为2011年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间美国商业保险和医疗保险优势(MA)健康计划成员。利用行政数据确定接受脊椎按摩治疗和初级保健医生治疗的情况。对商业保险人群和MA人群分别使用条件逻辑回归进行分析。对商业人群的分析按年龄(<45岁;≥45岁)进一步分层。计算比值比以衡量不同危险时期的关联。进行了一项二级描述性分析,以确定将脊椎按摩就诊作为手法治疗暴露指标的相关性。
共有1829例VBA中风病例(1159例 - 商业保险人群;670例 - MA人群)。研究结果表明,无论是总体人群还是按年龄分层的样本,脊椎按摩就诊与VBA中风之间均无显著关联。在商业保险人群和MA人群中,无论危险时期长短,初级保健医生就诊与VBA中风发生率之间均存在显著关联。年龄分层样本的结果相似。二级分析结果表明,在商业保险人群中,几乎三分之一的中风病例以及MA队列中的2例病例中,仅有1例在脊椎按摩就诊记录中提及了手法操作。
我们发现接受脊椎按摩治疗与VBA中风风险之间无显著关联。我们得出结论,手法操作不太可能是VBA中风的病因。初级保健医生就诊与VBA中风之间的正相关很可能是由于患者因动脉夹层的症状(头痛和颈部疼痛)而决定寻求治疗。我们进一步得出结论,将脊椎按摩就诊作为手法治疗暴露的衡量指标可能会导致与VBA中风发生关联强度的估计不可靠。