Suppr超能文献

整脊疗法与椎基底动脉卒中风险:在美国商业保险和医疗保险优势人群中进行的病例对照研究结果

Chiropractic care and the risk of vertebrobasilar stroke: results of a case-control study in U.S. commercial and Medicare Advantage populations.

作者信息

Kosloff Thomas M, Elton David, Tao Jiang, Bannister Wade M

机构信息

Optum Health - Clinical Programs at United Health Group, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA.

Optum Health - Clinical Analytics at United Health Group, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA.

出版信息

Chiropr Man Therap. 2015 Jun 16;23:19. doi: 10.1186/s12998-015-0063-x. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is controversy surrounding the risk of manipulation, which is often used by chiropractors, with respect to its association with vertebrobasilar artery system (VBA) stroke. The objective of this study was to compare the associations between chiropractic care and VBA stroke with recent primary care physician (PCP) care and VBA stroke.

METHODS

The study design was a case-control study of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage (MA) health plan members in the U.S. population between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2013. Administrative data were used to identify exposures to chiropractic and PCP care. Separate analyses using conditional logistic regression were conducted for the commercially insured and the MA populations. The analysis of the commercial population was further stratified by age (<45 years; ≥45 years). Odds ratios were calculated to measure associations for different hazard periods. A secondary descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the relevance of using chiropractic visits as a proxy for exposure to manipulative treatment.

RESULTS

There were a total of 1,829 VBA stroke cases (1,159 - commercial; 670 - MA). The findings showed no significant association between chiropractic visits and VBA stroke for either population or for samples stratified by age. In both commercial and MA populations, there was a significant association between PCP visits and VBA stroke incidence regardless of length of hazard period. The results were similar for age-stratified samples. The findings of the secondary analysis showed that chiropractic visits did not report the inclusion of manipulation in almost one third of stroke cases in the commercial population and in only 1 of 2 cases of the MA cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant association between exposure to chiropractic care and the risk of VBA stroke. We conclude that manipulation is an unlikely cause of VBA stroke. The positive association between PCP visits and VBA stroke is most likely due to patient decisions to seek care for the symptoms (headache and neck pain) of arterial dissection. We further conclude that using chiropractic visits as a measure of exposure to manipulation may result in unreliable estimates of the strength of association with the occurrence of VBA stroke.

摘要

背景

脊椎按摩疗法中常用的手法操作与椎基底动脉系统(VBA)中风的关联存在争议。本研究的目的是比较脊椎按摩治疗与VBA中风的关联以及近期初级保健医生(PCP)治疗与VBA中风的关联。

方法

本研究设计为一项病例对照研究,研究对象为2011年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间美国商业保险和医疗保险优势(MA)健康计划成员。利用行政数据确定接受脊椎按摩治疗和初级保健医生治疗的情况。对商业保险人群和MA人群分别使用条件逻辑回归进行分析。对商业人群的分析按年龄(<45岁;≥45岁)进一步分层。计算比值比以衡量不同危险时期的关联。进行了一项二级描述性分析,以确定将脊椎按摩就诊作为手法治疗暴露指标的相关性。

结果

共有1829例VBA中风病例(1159例 - 商业保险人群;670例 - MA人群)。研究结果表明,无论是总体人群还是按年龄分层的样本,脊椎按摩就诊与VBA中风之间均无显著关联。在商业保险人群和MA人群中,无论危险时期长短,初级保健医生就诊与VBA中风发生率之间均存在显著关联。年龄分层样本的结果相似。二级分析结果表明,在商业保险人群中,几乎三分之一的中风病例以及MA队列中的2例病例中,仅有1例在脊椎按摩就诊记录中提及了手法操作。

结论

我们发现接受脊椎按摩治疗与VBA中风风险之间无显著关联。我们得出结论,手法操作不太可能是VBA中风的病因。初级保健医生就诊与VBA中风之间的正相关很可能是由于患者因动脉夹层的症状(头痛和颈部疼痛)而决定寻求治疗。我们进一步得出结论,将脊椎按摩就诊作为手法治疗暴露的衡量指标可能会导致与VBA中风发生关联强度的估计不可靠。

相似文献

2
Examining vertebrobasilar artery stroke in two Canadian provinces.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4 Suppl):S170-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816454e0.
3
Risk of Carotid Stroke after Chiropractic Care: A Population-Based Case-Crossover Study.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Apr;26(4):842-850. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.10.031. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
4
Examining vertebrobasilar artery stroke in two Canadian provinces.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2 Suppl):S194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.019.
5
Risk of stroke after chiropractic spinal manipulation in medicare B beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years with neck pain.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 Feb;38(2):93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
6
A population-based case-series of Ontario patients who develop a vertebrobasilar artery stroke after seeing a chiropractor.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Jan;34(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.11.001.
7
Chiropractic manipulation and stroke: a population-based case-control study.
Stroke. 2001 May;32(5):1054-60. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.5.1054.
8
Chiropractic care and risk for acute lumbar disc herniation: a population-based self-controlled case series study.
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jul;27(7):1526-1537. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5325-y. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
9
Regional Supply of Chiropractic Care and Visits to Primary Care Physicians for Back and Neck Pain.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;28(4):481-90. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.04.150005.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined chiropractic care and Tai Chi for chronic neck pain: A protocol for a pilot randomized trial.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Apr 11;45:101482. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101482. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
What's the harm? Results of an active surveillance adverse event reporting system for chiropractors and physiotherapists.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 19;19(8):e0309069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309069. eCollection 2024.
3
Plausible Mechanisms of Causation of Immediate Stroke by Cervical Spine Manipulation: A Narrative Review.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 20;16(3):e56565. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56565. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Symptoms of Patients With Vertebral Artery Dissection Presenting to Chiropractors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cureus. 2023 Dec 29;15(12):e51297. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51297. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Vertebral arteries do not experience tensile force during manual cervical spine manipulation applied to human cadavers.
J Man Manip Ther. 2023 Aug;31(4):261-269. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2148048. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
8
Multimodal chiropractic care for migraine: A pilot randomized controlled trial.
Cephalalgia. 2021 Mar;41(3):318-328. doi: 10.1177/0333102420963844. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
9
The Integrative Migraine Pain Alleviation through Chiropractic Therapy (IMPACT) trial: Study rationale, design and intervention validation.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jan 22;17:100531. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100531. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
Commentary on: A risk-benefit assessment strategy to exclude cervical artery dissection in spinal manual therapy: a comprehensive review.
Ann Med. 2019 Aug-Sep;51(5-6):330-331. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2019.1639807. Epub 2019 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

3
Conservative physical therapy management for the treatment of cervicogenic headache: a systematic review.
J Man Manip Ther. 2013 May;21(2):113-24. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000025.
4
The Association Between Cervical Spine Manipulation and Carotid Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 Nov-Dec;38(9):672-676. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.09.005. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
5
Evidence-based guidelines for the chiropractic treatment of adults with neck pain.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jan;37(1):42-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
6
Cervical artery dissection: trauma and other potential mechanical trigger events.
Neurology. 2013 May 21;80(21):1950-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318293e2eb. Epub 2013 May 1.
7
Systematic review of manual therapies for nonspecific neck pain.
Joint Bone Spine. 2013 Oct;80(5):508-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
8
Assessing the risk of stroke from neck manipulation: a systematic review.
Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Oct;66(10):940-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.03004.x.
9
Cervical manipulation for neck pain.
PM R. 2012 Aug;4(8):606-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.07.003.
10
Should we abandon cervical spine manipulation for mechanical neck pain? No.
BMJ. 2012 Jun 7;344:e3680. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3680.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验