Frissen Aleida, Lieverse Ritsaert, Marcelis Machteld, Drukker Marjan, Delespaul Philippe
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616 (VIJV1), 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;50(10):1511-8. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1082-6. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
Early social and cognitive alterations in psychotic disorder, associated with familial liability and environmental exposures, may contribute to lower than expected educational achievement. The aims of the present study were to investigate (1) how differences in educational level between parents and their children vary across patients, their healthy siblings, and healthy controls (effect familial liability), and across two environmental risk factors for psychotic disorder: childhood trauma and childhood urban exposure (effect environment) and (2) to what degree the association between familial liability and educational differential was moderated by the environmental exposures.
Patients with a diagnosis of non-affective psychotic disorder (n = 629), 552 non-psychotic siblings and 326 healthy controls from the Netherlands and Belgium were studied. Participants reported their highest level of education and that of their parents. Childhood trauma was assessed with the Dutch version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form. Urban exposure, expressed as population density, was rated across five levels.
Overall, participants had a higher level of education than their parents. This difference was significantly reduced in the patient group, and the healthy siblings displayed intergenerational differences that were in between those of controls and patients. Higher levels of childhood urban exposure were also associated with a smaller intergenerational educational differential. There was no evidence for differential sensitivity to childhood trauma and childhood urbanicity across the three groups.
Intergenerational difference in educational achievements is decreased in patients with psychotic disorder and to a lesser extent in siblings of patients with psychotic disorder, and across higher levels of childhood urban exposure. More research is required to better understand the dynamics between early social and cognitive alterations in those at risk in relation to progress through the educational system and to understand the interaction between urban environment and educational outcomes.
精神病性障碍早期的社会和认知改变,与家族易感性和环境暴露相关,可能导致教育成就低于预期。本研究的目的是调查:(1)父母与其子女之间教育水平的差异在患者、其健康兄弟姐妹和健康对照者之间如何变化(家族易感性效应),以及在精神病性障碍的两个环境风险因素——童年创伤和童年城市暴露方面如何变化(环境效应);(2)环境暴露在多大程度上调节了家族易感性与教育差异之间的关联。
对来自荷兰和比利时的629例非情感性精神病性障碍患者、552名非精神病性兄弟姐妹和326名健康对照者进行了研究。参与者报告了他们自己及其父母的最高教育水平。采用荷兰版儿童创伤问卷简表评估童年创伤。城市暴露以人口密度表示,分为五个等级。
总体而言,参与者的教育水平高于其父母。这种差异在患者组中显著减小,健康兄弟姐妹的代际差异介于对照组和患者组之间。童年城市暴露水平较高也与较小的代际教育差异相关。没有证据表明三组对童年创伤和童年城市化的敏感性存在差异。
精神病性障碍患者的教育成就代际差异减小,精神病性障碍患者的兄弟姐妹代际差异减小程度较小,且在童年城市暴露水平较高的人群中也是如此。需要更多研究来更好地理解有风险者早期社会和认知改变与教育系统进程之间的动态关系,以及理解城市环境与教育结果之间相互作用。