Suppr超能文献

ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时代的β受体阻滞剂治疗

β-Blocker Therapy in the Era of Primary Percutaneous Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

作者信息

Lee You-Hong, Park Jin-Sun, Tahk Seung-Jea, Hwang Gyo-Seung, Yoon Myeong-Ho, Choi So-Yeon, Choi Byoung-Joo, Lim Hong-Seok, Yang Hyoung-Mo, Seo Kyoung-Woo, Shin Joon-Han

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Cardiology. 2015;132(2):91-100. doi: 10.1159/000431077. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

With the present therapeutic advances in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the role of β-blockers in ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) has remained contentious.

METHODS

We analyzed the data and clinical outcomes of 901 STEMI patients who had undergone primary PCI. We classified the patients into β-blocker (n = 598) and non-β-blocker groups (n = 303).

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of all-cause death was 10.0% in the β-blocker group and 25.4% in the non-β-blocker group (p < 0.001). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was 22.1% in the β-blocker group and 34.3% in the non-β-blocker group (p < 0.001). The relative hazard ratio (HR) of β-blockers for all-cause death and MACE with low left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF; <50%) was 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.86, p = 0.009] and 0.75 (95% CI 0.51-1.09, p = 0.125), respectively. In patients with normal LVEF (≥50%), the relative HR of β-blockers for death and MACE were 0.50 (95% CI 0.29-0.88, p = 0.016) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.51-1.12, p = 0.162), respectively. After propensity score matching of the difference of the baseline characteristics, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated lower mortality in the β-blocker group than in the non-β-blocker group with both low LVEF and normal LVEF (p = 0.02 and p = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

β-Blockers have beneficial clinical outcomes in the era of primary PCI for STEMI, regardless of the LVEF. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

摘要

目的

在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时代,随着当前治疗方法的进步,β受体阻滞剂在ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死(STEMI)中的作用一直存在争议。

方法

我们分析了901例行直接PCI的STEMI患者的数据和临床结局。我们将患者分为β受体阻滞剂组(n = 598)和非β受体阻滞剂组(n = 303)。

结果

β受体阻滞剂组全因死亡率的累积发生率为10.0%,非β受体阻滞剂组为25.4%(p < 0.001)。β受体阻滞剂组主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生率为22.1%,非β受体阻滞剂组为34.3%(p < 0.001)。左心室射血分数(LVEF;<50%)较低时,β受体阻滞剂对全因死亡和MACE的相对风险比(HR)分别为0.55 [95%置信区间(CI)0.35 - 0.86,p = 0.009]和0.75(95% CI 0.51 - 1.09,p = 0.125)。在LVEF正常(≥50%)的患者中,β受体阻滞剂对死亡和MACE的相对HR分别为0.50(95% CI 0.29 - 0.88,p = 0.016)和0.75(95% CI 0.51 - 1.12,p = 0.162)。在对基线特征差异进行倾向得分匹配后 Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,无论LVEF高低,β受体阻滞剂组的死亡率均低于非β受体阻滞剂组(分别为p = 0.02和p = 0.001)。

结论

在直接PCI治疗STEMI的时代,无论LVEF如何,β受体阻滞剂都具有有益的临床结局。© 2015 S. Karger AG,巴塞尔。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验