Hess Erik P, Grudzen Corita R, Thomson Richard, Raja Ali S, Carpenter Christopher R
The Department of Emergency Medicine, the Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, the Division of Healthcare Policy Research, Department of Health Services Research, and the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
The Departments of Emergency Medicine and Population Health, New York University, New York, NY.
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;22(7):856-64. doi: 10.1111/acem.12703. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
Shared decision-making (SDM), a collaborative process in which patients and providers make health care decisions together, taking into account the best scientific evidence available, as well as the patient's values and preferences, is being increasingly advocated as the optimal approach to decision-making for many health care decisions. The rapidly paced and often chaotic environment of the emergency department (ED), however, is a unique clinical setting that offers many practical and contextual challenges. Despite these challenges, in a recent survey emergency physicians reported there to be more than one reasonable management option for over 50% of their patients and that they take an SDM approach in 58% of such patients. SDM has also been selected as the topic on which to develop a future research agenda at the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference, "Shared Decision-making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-relevant Patient-centered Research Agenda" (http://www.saem.org/annual-meeting/education/2016-aem-consensus-conference). In this paper the authors describe the conceptual model of SDM as originally conceived by Charles and Gafni and highlight aspects of the model relevant to the practice of emergency medicine. In addition, through the use of vignettes from the authors' clinical practices, the applicability of SDM to contemporary EM practice is illustrated and the ethical and pragmatic implications of taking an SDM approach are explored. It is hoped that this document will be read in advance of the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference, to facilitate group discussions at the conference.
共同决策(SDM)是一种患者与医疗服务提供者共同做出医疗决策的协作过程,该过程会考虑现有的最佳科学证据以及患者的价值观和偏好。作为许多医疗决策的最佳方法,共同决策正越来越多地得到倡导。然而,急诊科快节奏且通常混乱的环境是一种独特的临床场景,存在许多实际和背景方面的挑战。尽管有这些挑战,但在最近的一项调查中,急诊医生报告称,超过50%的患者有不止一种合理的管理选择,并且他们在58%的此类患者中采用了共同决策方法。共同决策还被选为2016年学术急诊医学共识会议制定未来研究议程的主题,即“急诊科的共同决策:制定与政策相关的以患者为中心的研究议程”(http://www.saem.org/annual-meeting/education/2016-aem-consensus-conference)。在本文中,作者描述了最初由查尔斯和加夫尼构想的共同决策概念模型,并强调了该模型与急诊医学实践相关的方面。此外,通过使用作者临床实践中的案例,阐述了共同决策在当代急诊医学实践中的适用性,并探讨了采用共同决策方法的伦理和实际意义。希望本文能在2016年学术急诊医学共识会议之前阅读,以促进会议上的小组讨论。