Schäfer Marie, Haun Daniel B M, Tomasello Michael
Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Department of Psychology, University of Jena.
Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1252-60. doi: 10.1177/0956797615586188. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
Distributing the spoils of a joint enterprise on the basis of work contribution or relative productivity seems natural to the modern Western mind. But such notions of merit-based distributive justice may be culturally constructed norms that vary with the social and economic structure of a group. In the present research, we showed that children from three different cultures have very different ideas about distributive justice. Whereas children from a modern Western society distributed the spoils of a joint enterprise precisely in proportion to productivity, children from a gerontocratic pastoralist society in Africa did not take merit into account at all. Children from a partially hunter-gatherer, egalitarian African culture distributed the spoils more equally than did the other two cultures, with merit playing only a limited role. This pattern of results suggests that some basic notions of distributive justice are not universal intuitions of the human species but rather culturally constructed behavioral norms.
在现代西方人的思维中,根据工作贡献或相对生产力来分配合资企业的收益似乎是自然而然的。但这种基于功绩的分配正义观念可能是文化建构的规范,会因群体的社会和经济结构而有所不同。在本研究中,我们发现来自三种不同文化的儿童对分配正义有着截然不同的观念。现代西方社会的儿童会精确地按照生产力比例来分配合资企业的收益,而非洲一个由长者统治的牧民社会的儿童则完全不考虑功绩。来自非洲部分狩猎采集、平等主义文化的儿童比其他两种文化的儿童更平等地分配收益,功绩只起到有限的作用。这种结果模式表明,一些分配正义的基本观念并非人类普遍的直觉,而是文化建构的行为规范。