Suppr超能文献

相似文献

1
Against 'Saving Lives': Equal Concern and Differential Impact.
Bioethics. 2016 Mar;30(3):159-64. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12171. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
2
Double jeopardy, the equal value of lives and the veil of ignorance: a rejoinder to Harris.
J Med Ethics. 1996 Aug;22(4):204-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.4.204.
3
Double jeopardy and the use of QALYs in health care allocation.
J Med Ethics. 1995 Jun;21(3):144-50. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.3.144.
4
Response to open peer commentaries on "Complete lives in the balance".
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):W3-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161003697362.
5
Balancing principles, QALYs, and the straw men of resource allocation.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):48-50. doi: 10.1080/15265161003632971.
6
Dueling ethical frameworks for allocating health resources.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):54-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161003632989.
7
The distribution of life-saving medical resources: equality, life expectancy, and choice behind the veil.
Soc Philos Policy. 2002 Summer;19(2):212-45. doi: 10.1017/s0265052502192090.
8
Complete lives, incomplete theories.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):58-60. doi: 10.1080/15265161003632997.
10
Justice and outcomes research: the ethical limits.
J Clin Ethics. 1993 Fall;4(3):258-61.

引用本文的文献

1
The physician in the face of death in the emergency room.
Rev Saude Publica. 2018;52:42. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000296. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验