Amsterdam Jay D, Lorenzo-Luaces Lorenzo, Soeller Irene, Li Susan Qing, Mao Jun J, DeRubeis Robert J
Depression Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Depression Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2015 Oct 1;185:31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.05.070. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
Compare the safety and effectiveness of continuation antidepressant versus mood stabilizer monotherapy for preventing depressive relapse in bipolar II disorder.
Subjects ≥18 years old with bipolar II depression (n=129) were randomized to double-blind venlafaxine or lithium monotherapy for 12 weeks. Responders with a ≥50% reduction in depression score were continued for an additional 6 months of relapse-prevention monotherapy. Primary outcome was depressive relapse during continuation monotherapy. Secondary outcomes included sustained response rate from initiation of treatment to study end-point, relapse hazard, time to relapse, change in mania ratings, and frequency of treatment-emergent sub-syndromal hypomania and/or depressive episodes.
Venlafaxine produced greater sustained response rate versus lithium (p<0.0001); however, there was no difference in relapse rate for venlafaxine (7.5%) versus lithium (26.7%) (p=0.079); relapse hazard (p=0.073), or time to relapse (p=0.090) between treatment conditions during continuation monotherapy. There were no group differences in mania rating scores over time and no difference in frequency or duration of syndromal or sub-syndromal hypomanic episodes. There were more sub-syndromal depressive episodes during lithium monotherapy (p=0.03).
Sample size was limited by the lower sustained response rate for lithium versus venlafaxine; study was not specifically powered to detect differences in treatment-emergent hypomanic or depressive episodes between groups.
Results suggest that continuation venlafaxine monotherapy may provide similar prophylactic effectiveness relative to lithium, with no difference in treatment-emergent hypomanic episodes and without the need for frequent serum lithium level and metabolic monitoring. Larger, prospective trials are needed to confirm these observations.
比较持续使用抗抑郁药与心境稳定剂单药治疗预防双相II型障碍抑郁复发的安全性和有效性。
年龄≥18岁的双相II型抑郁症患者(n = 129)被随机分配接受双盲文拉法辛或锂盐单药治疗12周。抑郁评分降低≥50%的缓解者继续接受6个月的预防复发单药治疗。主要结局是持续单药治疗期间的抑郁复发。次要结局包括从治疗开始到研究终点的持续缓解率、复发风险、复发时间、躁狂评分变化以及治疗中出现的亚综合征性轻躁狂和/或抑郁发作的频率。
与锂盐相比,文拉法辛产生了更高的持续缓解率(p<0.0001);然而,文拉法辛(7.5%)与锂盐(26.7%)的复发率(p = 0.079)、复发风险(p = 0.073)或持续单药治疗期间不同治疗组之间的复发时间(p = 0.090)没有差异。随着时间的推移,两组在躁狂评分上没有差异,在综合征性或亚综合征性轻躁狂发作的频率或持续时间上也没有差异。锂盐单药治疗期间有更多的亚综合征性抑郁发作(p = 0.03)。
样本量受锂盐与文拉法辛较低的持续缓解率限制;该研究没有专门设计以检测两组之间治疗中出现的轻躁狂或抑郁发作的差异。
结果表明,持续使用文拉法辛单药治疗相对于锂盐可能提供相似的预防效果,在治疗中出现的轻躁狂发作方面没有差异,并且无需频繁监测血清锂水平和代谢情况。需要更大规模的前瞻性试验来证实这些观察结果。