Ellis Vincenzo A, Cornet Stéphane, Merrill Loren, Kunkel Melanie R, Tsunekage Toshi, Ricklefs Robert E
Department of Biology, University of Missouri- St. Louis, One University Blvd, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA,
Parasitol Res. 2015 Oct;114(10):3627-36. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4588-7. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
Understanding the complexity of host immune responses to parasite infection requires controlled experiments that can inform observational field studies. Birds and their malaria parasites provide a useful model for understanding host-parasite relationships, but this model lacks a well-described experimental context for how hosts respond immunologically to infection. Here, ten canaries (Serinus canaria) were infected with the avian malaria parasite Plasmodium relictum (lineage SGS1) in a controlled laboratory setting with ten uninfected (control) birds. A suite of immunological blood parameters, including the concentration of four white blood cell types, the concentration of the acute phase protein haptoglobin, and the bacteria-killing ability of blood plasma, were repeatedly measured over a 25-day period covering the acute phase of a primary infection by P. relictum. Three infected and one control bird died during the course of the experiment. A multivariate statistical analysis of the immune indices revealed significant differences between infected and uninfected individuals between 5 and 14 days postinfection (dpi). Group differences corresponded to reduced concentrations of lymphocytes (5 dpi), heterophils (8 dpi), and monocytes (11 and 14 dpi), and an increase in haptoglobin (14 dpi), in infected birds relative to uninfected controls, and no change in bacteria-killing. Upon re-running the analysis with only the surviving birds, immunological differences between infected and control birds shifted to between 11 and 18 dpi. However, there were no clear correlates relating immune parameters to the likelihood of surviving the infection. The results presented here demonstrate the dynamic and complex nature of avian immune function during the acute phase of malaria infection and provide a context for studies investigating immune function in wild birds.
要理解宿主对寄生虫感染的免疫反应的复杂性,需要进行可控实验,以便为观察性的实地研究提供信息。鸟类及其疟原虫为理解宿主-寄生虫关系提供了一个有用的模型,但该模型缺乏关于宿主如何对感染做出免疫反应的详细实验背景。在这里,在一个可控的实验室环境中,将10只金丝雀(Serinus canaria)感染了禽疟原虫残疟原虫(谱系SGS1),同时设置10只未感染的(对照)鸟类。在覆盖残疟原虫初次感染急性期的25天内,反复测量了一系列免疫血液参数,包括四种白细胞类型的浓度、急性期蛋白触珠蛋白的浓度以及血浆的细菌杀伤能力。在实验过程中,3只感染的鸟和1只对照鸟死亡。对免疫指标的多变量统计分析显示,感染和未感染个体在感染后5至14天之间存在显著差异。与未感染的对照相比,感染鸟类的淋巴细胞(感染后5天)、嗜异性粒细胞(感染后8天)和单核细胞(感染后11天和14天)浓度降低,触珠蛋白增加(感染后14天),而细菌杀伤能力没有变化。仅对存活的鸟类重新进行分析时,感染和对照鸟类之间的免疫差异转移到了感染后11至18天。然而,没有明确的相关性将免疫参数与感染存活的可能性联系起来。这里呈现的结果证明了疟疾感染急性期鸟类免疫功能的动态和复杂性,并为研究野生鸟类的免疫功能提供了背景。