Department of Urology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Prostate Int. 2015 Jun;3(2):47-50. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
To determine whether robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be taught to chief residents and fellows without influencing operative outcomes.
Between August 2011 and June 2012, 388 patients underwent RARP by a single primary surgeon (DIL) at our institution. Our teaching algorithm divides RARP into five stages, and each trainee progresses through the stages in a sequential manner. Statistical analysis was conducted after grouping the cohort according to the surgeons operating the robotic console: attending only (n = 91), attending and fellow (n = 152), and attending and chief resident (n = 145). Approximately normal variables were compared utilizing one-way analysis of variance, and categorical variables were compared utilizing two-tailed χ(2) test; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
There was no difference in mean age (P = 0.590), body mass index (P = 0.339), preoperative SHIM (Sexual Health Inventory for Men) score (P = 0.084), preoperative AUASS (American Urologic Association Symptom Score) (P = 0.086), preoperative prostate-specific antigen (P = 0.258), clinical and pathological stage (P = 0.766 and P = 0.699, respectively), and preoperative and postoperative Gleason score (P = 0.775 and P = 0.870, respectively). Operative outcomes such as mean estimated blood loss (P = 0.807) and length of stay (P = 0.494) were similar. There was a difference in mean operative time (P < 0.001; attending only = 89.3 min, attending and fellow 125.4 min, and attending and chief resident 126.9 min). Functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively such as urinary continence rate (P = 0.977 and P = 0.720, respectively), and SHIM score (P = 0.661 and P = 0.890, respectively) were similar. The rate of positive surgical margins (P = 0.058) was similar.
Training chief residents and fellows to perform RARP may be associated with increased operative times, but does not compromise short-term functional and oncological outcomes.
确定机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)是否可以教授给住院总医师和研究员,而不会影响手术结果。
2011 年 8 月至 2012 年 6 月,我院单名主刀医师(DIL)为 388 例患者施行 RARP。我们的教学算法将 RARP 分为五个阶段,每位学员按顺序逐步完成各个阶段。根据手术机器人控制台操作的外科医生对队列进行分组后进行统计分析:仅主治医生(n=91)、主治医生和研究员(n=152)、主治医生和住院总医师(n=145)。利用单因素方差分析比较近似正态分布的变量,利用双侧 χ(2)检验比较分类变量;P<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。
平均年龄(P=0.590)、体重指数(P=0.339)、术前男性性功能健康量表(SHIM)评分(P=0.084)、术前美国泌尿外科学会症状评分(AUASS)(P=0.086)、术前前列腺特异性抗原(P=0.258)、临床和病理分期(P=0.766 和 P=0.699)以及术前和术后 Gleason 评分(P=0.775 和 P=0.870)均无差异。手术结果如平均估计失血量(P=0.807)和住院时间(P=0.494)也相似。平均手术时间有差异(P<0.001;仅主治医生=89.3 分钟,主治医生和研究员=125.4 分钟,主治医生和住院总医师=126.9 分钟)。术后 3 个月和 1 年的功能结果,如尿控率(P=0.977 和 P=0.720)和 SHIM 评分(P=0.661 和 P=0.890)也相似。阳性切缘率(P=0.058)也相似。
培训住院总医师和研究员进行 RARP 可能会增加手术时间,但不会影响短期功能和肿瘤学结果。