Huntzicker Steven, Nayak Rohit, Doyley Marvin M
University of Rochester , Hajim School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rochester, New York 14627.
University of Rochester , Hajim School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rochester, New York 14627 ; University of Rochester , Hajim School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester, New York 14627.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2014 Jul;1(2):027001. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.1.2.027001. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
Quantitative sparse array vascular elastography visualizes the shear modulus distribution within vascular tissues, information that clinicans could use to reduce the number of strokes each year. However, the low transmit power sparse array (SA) imaging could hamper the clinical usefulness of the resulting elastograms. In this study, we evaluated the performance of modulus elastograms recovered from simulated and physical vessel phantoms with varying attenuation coefficients (0.6, 1.5, and [Formula: see text]) and modulus contrasts ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text]) using SA imaging relative to those obtained with conventional linear array (CLA) and plane-wave (PW) imaging techniques. Plaques were visible in all modulus elastograms, but those produced using SA and PW contained less artifacts. The modulus contrast-to-noise ratio decreased rapidly with increasing modulus contrast and attenuation coefficient, but more quickly when SA imaging was performed than for CLA or PW. The errors incurred varied from 10.9% to 24% (CLA), 1.8% to 12% (SA), and [Formula: see text] (PW). Modulus elastograms produced with SA and PW imagings were not significantly different ([Formula: see text]). Despite the low transmit power, SA imaging can produce useful modulus elastograms in superficial organs, such as the carotid artery.
定量稀疏阵列血管弹性成像可显示血管组织内的剪切模量分布,临床医生可利用这些信息减少每年中风的数量。然而,低发射功率的稀疏阵列(SA)成像可能会妨碍所得弹性图的临床实用性。在本研究中,我们使用SA成像评估了从具有不同衰减系数(0.6、1.5和[公式:见原文])和模量对比度([公式:见原文]、[公式:见原文]和[公式:见原文])的模拟和物理血管模型中恢复的模量弹性图的性能,并与使用传统线性阵列(CLA)和平面波(PW)成像技术获得的弹性图进行比较。在所有模量弹性图中均可见斑块,但使用SA和PW生成的弹性图中的伪影较少。模量对比度噪声比随着模量对比度和衰减系数的增加而迅速降低,但在进行SA成像时比CLA或PW降低得更快。产生的误差在10.9%至24%(CLA)、1.8%至12%(SA)和[公式:见原文](PW)之间变化。使用SA和PW成像生成的模量弹性图无显著差异([公式:见原文])。尽管发射功率较低,但SA成像仍可在浅表器官(如颈动脉)中产生有用的模量弹性图。