Zamanzadeh Vahid, Ghahramanian Akram, Rassouli Maryam, Abbaszadeh Abbas, Alavi-Majd Hamid, Nikanfar Ali-Reza
Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Department of Pediatrics Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Caring Sci. 2015 Jun 1;4(2):165-78. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017. eCollection 2015 Jun.
The importance of content validity in the instrument psychometric and its relevance with reliability, have made it an essential step in the instrument development. This article attempts to give an overview of the content validity process and to explain the complexity of this process by introducing an example.
We carried out a methodological study conducted to examine the content validity of the patient-centered communication instrument through a two-step process (development and judgment). At the first step, domain determination, sampling (item generation) and instrument formation and at the second step, content validity ratio, content validity index and modified kappa statistic was performed. Suggestions of expert panel and item impact scores are used to examine the instrument face validity.
From a set of 188 items, content validity process identified seven dimensions includes trust building (eight items), informational support (seven items), emotional support (five items), problem solving (seven items), patient activation (10 items), intimacy/friendship (six items) and spirituality strengthening (14 items). Content validity study revealed that this instrument enjoys an appropriate level of content validity. The overall content validity index of the instrument using universal agreement approach was low; however, it can be advocated with respect to the high number of content experts that makes consensus difficult and high value of the S-CVI with the average approach, which was equal to 0.93.
This article illustrates acceptable quantities indices for content validity a new instrument and outlines them during design and psychometrics of patient-centered communication measuring instrument.
内容效度在工具心理测量中的重要性及其与信度的相关性,使其成为工具开发中的一个关键步骤。本文旨在概述内容效度过程,并通过一个例子来解释这一过程的复杂性。
我们进行了一项方法学研究,通过两步过程(开发和判断)来检验以患者为中心的沟通工具的内容效度。第一步,确定领域、抽样(生成条目)和形成工具;第二步,进行内容效度比、内容效度指数和修正的kappa统计。使用专家小组的建议和条目影响分数来检验工具的表面效度。
从一组188个条目中,内容效度过程确定了七个维度,包括建立信任(8个条目)、信息支持(7个条目)、情感支持(5个条目)、解决问题(7个条目)、患者激活(10个条目)、亲密/友谊(6个条目)和加强精神性(14个条目)。内容效度研究表明,该工具具有适当水平的内容效度。使用普遍共识方法得出的该工具的总体内容效度指数较低;然而,考虑到内容专家数量众多导致难以达成共识,以及采用平均法得出的S-CVI值较高(等于0.93),该工具还是可以被认可的。
本文阐述了一种新工具内容效度的可接受量化指标,并在以患者为中心的沟通测量工具的设计和心理测量过程中对其进行了概述。