Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;5(2):163-81. doi: 10.1177/1745691610362351.
Recently, intuitionist theories have been effective in capturing the academic discourse about morality. Intuitionist theories, like rationalist theories, offer important but only partial understanding of moral functioning. Both can be fallacious and succumb to truthiness: the attachment to one's opinions because they "feel right," potentially leading to harmful action or inaction. Both intuition and reasoning are involved in deliberation and expertise. Both are malleable from environmental and educational influence, making questions of normativity-which intuitions and reasoning skills to foster-of utmost importance. Good intuition and reasoning inform mature moral functioning, which needs to include capacities that promote sustainable human well-being. Individual capacities for habituated empathic concern and moral metacognition-moral locus of control, moral self-regulation, and moral self-reflection-comprise mature moral functioning, which also requires collective capacities for moral dialogue and moral institutions. These capacities underlie moral innovation and are necessary for solving the complex challenges humanity faces.
最近,直觉主义理论在捕捉关于道德的学术话语方面非常有效。直觉主义理论和理性主义理论一样,为理解道德功能提供了重要但只是部分的理解。两者都可能是错误的,并屈服于“真相感”:因为它们“感觉是对的”而坚持自己的观点,这可能导致有害的行动或不作为。直觉和推理都参与到深思熟虑和专业知识中。两者都可以受到环境和教育的影响,因此规范性问题——培养哪种直觉和推理技能——至关重要。良好的直觉和推理有助于成熟的道德功能,而成熟的道德功能需要包括促进人类可持续福祉的能力。习惯性共情关注和道德元认知的个体能力——道德控制点、道德自我调节和道德自我反思——构成了成熟的道德功能,这也需要集体的道德对话和道德机构的能力。这些能力是道德创新的基础,也是解决人类面临的复杂挑战所必需的。