Knox Randy W, Demons Samandra T, Cunningham Cord W
Emergency Medicine Physician Assistant Residency and Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, Fort Bliss, TX (Mr Knox).
United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Disease, Fort Detrick, MD (Dr Demons).
Wilderness Environ Med. 2015 Dec;26(4):509-13. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2015.03.030. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
The purpose of this investigation was to test a field-expedient, cost-effective method to decontaminate, sterilize, and package surgical instruments in an operational (combat) or austere environment using chlorhexidine sponges, ultraviolet C (UVC) light, and commercially available vacuum sealing.
This was a bench study of 4 experimental groups and 1 control group of 120 surgical instruments. Experimental groups were inoculated with a 10(6) concentration of common wound bacteria. The control group was vacuum sealed without inoculum. Groups 1, 2, and 3 were first scrubbed with a chlorhexidine sponge, rinsed, and dried. Group 1 was then packaged; group 2 was irradiated with UVC light, then packaged; group 3 was packaged, then irradiated with UVC light through the bag; and group 4 was packaged without chlorhexidine scrubbing or UVC irradiation. The UVC was not tested by itself, as it does not grossly clean. The instruments were stored overnight and tested for remaining colony forming units (CFU).
Data analysis was conducted using analysis of variance and group comparisons using the Tukey method. Group 4 CFU was statistically greater (P < .001) than the control group and groups 1 through 3. There was no statistically significant difference between the control group and groups 1 through 3.
Vacuum sealing of chlorhexidine-scrubbed contaminated instruments with and without handheld UVC irradiation appears to be an acceptable method of field decontamination. Chlorhexidine scrubbing alone achieved a 99.9% reduction in CFU, whereas adding UVC before packaging achieved sterilization or 100% reduction in CFU, and UVC through the bag achieved disinfection.
本研究旨在测试一种简便、经济高效的方法,即在作战(战斗)或艰苦环境中,使用洗必泰海绵、紫外线C(UVC)灯和市售真空密封技术对手术器械进行去污、消毒和包装。
这是一项针对120件手术器械的实验研究,分为4个实验组和1个对照组。实验组接种浓度为10(6)的常见伤口细菌。对照组不接种细菌,直接进行真空密封。第1、2和3组先用洗必泰海绵擦拭、冲洗并干燥。然后,第1组进行包装;第2组先用UVC灯照射,然后进行包装;第3组先进行包装,然后通过袋子用UVC灯照射;第4组不进行洗必泰擦拭或UVC照射直接包装。由于UVC本身不能进行彻底清洁,因此未单独对其进行测试。器械过夜储存后,检测剩余菌落形成单位(CFU)。
采用方差分析进行数据分析,并使用Tukey法进行组间比较。第4组的CFU在统计学上显著高于(P <.001)对照组以及第1至3组。对照组与第1至3组之间在统计学上无显著差异。
对于经过洗必泰擦拭的受污染器械,无论是否进行手持式UVC照射,真空密封似乎都是一种可接受的现场去污方法。仅用洗必泰擦拭可使CFU减少99.9%,而在包装前添加UVC可实现灭菌,即CFU减少100%,通过袋子进行UVC照射可实现消毒。