Salas-Wright Christopher P, Lee Sharon, Vaughn Michael G, Jang Yuri, Sanglang Cindy C
School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin.
School of Social Work, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015 Jul;85(4):362-70. doi: 10.1037/ort0000042.
Extant studies on the links between acculturation and mental and substance use disorders among Asian/Pacific Islanders have been based on the assumption that acculturation is a homogeneous construct. However, emerging evidence suggests that the various components of acculturation do not manifest independently, but rather cluster in ways that reflect distinct profiles. We employ data on Asian/Pacific Islanders from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (n = 968). Latent profile analysis is used to identify acculturation subgroups on the basis of indicator variables related to cultural identification, language ability and preference, and social engagement. Subsequently, the distribution of outcome variables in the domains of DSM disorders (lifetime history of clinical, personality, and substance use disorders) is examined across latent subgroups. We identified a 5-class solution: Class 1: Separated (12.91%), Class 2: Partial Bilingual/Bicultural (30.06%), Class 3: English Dominant/Asian Oriented (12.29%), Class 4: Full Bilingual/Bicultural (19.42%) and Class 5: Assimilated (25.31%). The highest rates of clinical disorders were observed among members of the 2 classes characterized by a strong preference for the use of the English language (Classes 3 and 5). The highest prevalence of nicotine (12%) and illicit drug use (15%) disorders was observed among members of the Assimilated class. Consistent with prior research, findings suggest that risk of morbidity is greater among more acculturated individuals; however, findings also suggest that an important level of nuance can be observed with respect to acculturative subtypes identified on the basis of cultural identification, language ability and preference, and social engagement.
关于亚洲/太平洋岛民文化适应与精神和物质使用障碍之间联系的现有研究一直基于这样一种假设,即文化适应是一个同质化的概念。然而,新出现的证据表明,文化适应的各个组成部分并非独立显现,而是以反映不同特征的方式聚类。我们使用了来自全国酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查的亚洲/太平洋岛民数据(n = 968)。潜在剖面分析用于根据与文化认同、语言能力和偏好以及社会参与相关的指标变量识别文化适应亚组。随后,在潜在亚组中检查DSM障碍领域(临床、人格和物质使用障碍的终生病史)中结果变量的分布。我们确定了一个五类解决方案:第1类:分离型(12.91%),第2类:部分双语/双文化型(30.06%),第3类:英语主导/亚洲导向型(12.29%),第4类:完全双语/双文化型(19.42%)和第5类:同化型(25.31%)。在以强烈偏好使用英语为特征的两类人群(第3类和第5类)中观察到临床障碍的发生率最高。在同化类人群中观察到尼古丁(12%)和非法药物使用(15%)障碍的患病率最高。与先前的研究一致,研究结果表明,文化适应程度较高的个体发病风险更大;然而,研究结果还表明,在基于文化认同、语言能力和偏好以及社会参与确定的文化适应亚型方面,可以观察到重要的细微差别。