Suppr超能文献

基于实际驾驶的混合动力乘用车二氧化碳和燃料消耗效益。

Hybrid-Electric Passenger Car Carbon Dioxide and Fuel Consumption Benefits Based on Real-World Driving.

机构信息

†School of Engineering, University of Vermont, 33 Colchester Ave, Burlington, Vermont 05405, United States.

‡Transportation Research Center, University of Vermont, 210 Colchester Ave, Burlington, Vermont 05405, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 18;49(16):10199-208. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01203. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

Abstract

Hybrid-electric vehicles (HEVs) have lower fuel consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions than conventional vehicles (CVs), on average, based on laboratory tests, but there is a paucity of real-world, on-road HEV emissions and performance data needed to assess energy use and emissions associated with real-world driving, including the effects of road grade. This need is especially great as the electrification of the passenger vehicle fleet (from HEVs to PHEVs to BEVs) increases in response to climate and energy concerns. We compared tailpipe CO2 emissions and fuel consumption of an HEV passenger car to a CV of the same make and model during real-world, on-the-road network driving to quantify the in-use benefit of one popular full HEV technology. Using vehicle specific power (VSP) assignments that account for measured road grade, the mean CV/HEV ratios of CO2 tailpipe emissions or fuel consumption defined the corresponding HEV "benefit" factor for each VSP class (1 kW/ton resolution). Averaging over all VSP classes for driving in all seasons, including temperatures from -13 to +35 °C in relatively steep (-13.2 to +11.5% grade), hilly terrain, mean (±SD) CO2 emission benefit factors were 4.5 ± 3.6, 2.5 ± 1.7, and 1.4 ± 0.5 for city, exurban/suburban arterial and highway driving, respectively. Benefit factor magnitude corresponded to the frequency of electric-drive-only (EDO) operation, which was modeled as a logarithmic function of VSP. A combined model explained 95% of the variance in HEV benefit for city, 75% for arterial and 57% for highway driving. Benefit factors consistently exceeded 2 for VSP classes with greater than 50% EDO (i.e., only city and arterial driving). The reported HEV benefits account for real-world road grade that is often neglected in regulatory emissions and fuel economy tests. Fuel use HEV benefit factors were 1.3 and 2 for the regulatory highway (HWFET) and city (FTP) cycles, respectively, 18% and 31% higher than the EPA adjusted fuel economy values. This study establishes the significant need for high-resolution vehicle activity and road grade data in transportation data sets to accurately forecast future petroleum and GHG emissions savings from hybridization of the passenger vehicle fleet.

摘要

混合动力汽车(HEV)在实验室测试中平均比传统汽车(CV)具有更低的燃料消耗和二氧化碳(CO2)排放,但缺乏真实世界的道路行驶中 HEV 排放和性能数据,这些数据对于评估与实际驾驶相关的能源使用和排放至关重要,包括道路坡度的影响。随着应对气候和能源问题而增加的乘用车电气化(从 HEV 到 PHEV 到 BEV),这种需求变得尤为迫切。我们在真实世界的道路网络行驶中比较了一辆 HEV 乘用车和同型号 CV 的尾气 CO2 排放和燃料消耗,以量化一种流行的全混合动力技术的实际使用效益。使用考虑到实测道路坡度的车辆特定功率(VSP)分配,CV/HEV 的 CO2 尾气排放或燃料消耗比值定义了每个 VSP 等级(1kW/吨分辨率)的相应 HEV“效益”因子。在所有季节的所有 VSP 等级的驾驶中进行平均,包括在相对陡峭的(-13.2 至+11.5%坡度)、丘陵地形中从-13 到+35°C 的温度,城市、城郊/郊区干道和高速公路驾驶的平均(±SD)CO2 排放效益因子分别为 4.5±3.6、2.5±1.7 和 1.4±0.5。效益因子的大小与电动驱动仅(EDO)操作的频率相对应,该操作被建模为 VSP 的对数函数。一个综合模型解释了城市驾驶中 95%的 HEV 效益、动脉驾驶中 75%的效益和高速公路驾驶中 57%的效益。对于 EDO 大于 50%的 VSP 等级(即仅城市和动脉驾驶),效益因子始终超过 2。报告的 HEV 效益考虑到了在监管排放和燃油经济性测试中经常被忽视的实际道路坡度。在高速公路(HWFET)和城市(FTP)循环中,燃料使用 HEV 效益因子分别为 1.3 和 2,比 EPA 调整后的燃油经济性值分别高出 18%和 31%。本研究确立了在交通数据集内需要高分辨率的车辆活动和道路坡度数据,以准确预测未来从乘用车电气化中节省的石油和 GHG 排放。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验