Keceli Huseyin Gencay, Kamak Gulen, Erdemir Ebru Olgun, Evginer Mustafa Serdar, Dolgun Anil
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey.
J Periodontol. 2015 Nov;86(11):1221-30. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.150015. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is an autologous preparation that has encouraging effects in healing and regeneration. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of coronally advanced flap (CAF) + connective tissue graft (CTG) + PRF in Miller Class I and II recession treatment compared to CAF + CTG.
Forty patients were treated surgically with either CAF + CTG + PRF (test group) or CAF + CTG (control group). Clinical parameters of plaque index, gingival index, vertical recession (VR), probing depth, clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue width (KTW), horizontal recession (HR), mucogingival junction localization, and tissue thickness (TT) were recorded at baseline and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Root coverage (RC), complete RC (CRC), attachment gain (AG), and keratinized tissue change (KTC) were also calculated.
All individuals completed the entire study period. At baseline, mean VR, HR, CAL, KTW, and TT values were similar (P >0.05). In both groups, all parameters showed significant improvement after treatment (P <0.001), and except TT (P <0.05), no intergroup difference was observed at 6 months after surgery. The amount of RC and AG, but not KTC and CRC, was higher in the PRF-applied group (P <0.05).
According to the results, the addition of PRF did not further develop the outcomes of CAF + CTG treatment except increasing the TT. However, this single trial is not sufficient to advocate the true clinical effect of PRF on recession treatment with CAF + CTG, and additional trials are needed.
富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)是一种自体制剂,在愈合和再生方面具有令人鼓舞的效果。本试验的目的是评估与CAF + CTG相比,冠向推进瓣(CAF)+结缔组织移植(CTG)+ PRF在治疗米勒I类和II类牙龈退缩中的有效性。
40例患者接受了CAF + CTG + PRF(试验组)或CAF + CTG(对照组)的手术治疗。在基线以及术后3个月和6个月记录菌斑指数、牙龈指数、垂直退缩(VR)、探诊深度、临床附着水平(CAL)、角化组织宽度(KTW)、水平退缩(HR)、膜龈联合定位和组织厚度(TT)等临床参数。还计算了牙根覆盖(RC)、完全牙根覆盖(CRC)、附着获得(AG)和角化组织变化(KTC)。
所有个体均完成了整个研究期。在基线时,平均VR、HR、CAL、KTW和TT值相似(P>0.05)。两组在治疗后所有参数均有显著改善(P<0.001),并且除TT外(P<0.05),术后6个月未观察到组间差异。应用PRF组的RC和AG量较高,但KTC和CRC量不高(P<0.05)。
根据结果,除了增加TT外,添加PRF并没有进一步改善CAF + CTG治疗的效果。然而,这一单一试验不足以主张PRF对CAF + CTG治疗牙龈退缩的真正临床效果,还需要更多试验。