Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Health Services Management, School of Medical Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
J Patient Saf. 2018 Dec;14(4):213-226. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000199.
In the relevant literature, the establishment of a patient safety culture (PSC) is a vital step in providing quality service to patients. The goal of this study was to establish a baseline for PSC in Iranian academic hospitals and to determine its strength and weaknesses.
A survey was distributed in 26 academic hospitals linked to the Iran and Tehran Universities of Medical Sciences, of which 18 participated. The questionnaire, the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC), was used to collect the data. The questionnaire contained 14 dimensions and 43 items, and the questions were scored using a 5-point Likert scale in which 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree.The results were expressed in the percentage of positive responses (%), or the percentage of positive responses (e.g., agree, strongly agree) to positively worded items (e.g., "Hospital units work well together to provide the best care for patients") in relation to the percentage of negative responses (e.g., disagree, strongly disagree) to negatively worded items (e.g., "When an event is reported, it feels like the person is being written up, not the problem"). To score each item, the following formula was applied: % of Positive Responses = [(No. of Agree + No. of Totally Agree) / Total No. of Subjects Responding to the Question)] × 100). For the negatively worded items, the answers were reversed. To score each dimension, a composite mean score of positive responses were estimated. The same methodology was applied to the scoring of the PSC of each hospital. (i.e., the composite mean score of positive responses on 12 dimensions was obtained). Note that the data reported in the tables of this manuscript represent percentages, and for ease of communication, (%) are omitted from the stated tables. In the text, however, we have used percent wherever needed.To categorize the hospitals' safety culture from very weak to very strong, a range of 0.0% to 100% positive responses on the PSC questionnaire was divided by 5 ((100% - 0.0%) / 5 = 20%), and 5 equally spaced intervals were defined (i.e., 0.0%-20.0%, very weak; 21.0%-40.0%, weak; 41.0%-60.0%, intermediate; 61.0%-80.0%, strong; 81.0%-100.0%, very strong).The convenience sampling method was used to select the samples. For the purpose of this research, 35 questionnaires were randomly distributed in each hospital: 15 among nurses and assistant nurses (as the frontline personnel having the most direct contact with patients) and 20 among other clinical and paraclinical personnel as well as other groups (physicians, residents, interns, ward secretaries, laboratory personnel, radiology personnel, and managers). The questionnaires were distributed and collected by the hospitals' head nurses. The data were analyzed using a one-sample and independent t test.
The mean score of the hospitals on the PSC ranged from 42.74 to 67.22, 12 of 18 hospitals obtained an "intermediate" ranking position, and 6 obtained a "strong" ranking position on the PSC. The overall mean (SD) score for the entire hospital for PSC was 56.74 (18.41). No significant difference was observed between the Iran and Tehran universities of medical sciences hospitals for the PSC. However, significant differences were observable at the dimension and item levels.A hospital's strengths lie in the "organizational learning-continuous improvement," "teamwork within hospital units," and "hospital management support for patient safety" dimensions. Dimensions including "feedback and communication concerning errors," "communication openness," "staffing," and "nonpunitive response to error" were shown to be weak points of all of the hospitals in this study.
The PSC of the investigated hospitals is not at an ideal level and is in need of serious improvement, particularly in the dimensions of feedback and communication regarding errors, communication openness, staffing, and nonpunitive response to error. The same conditions hold true for other Iranian hospitals (i.e., the Afshar and Sadoughi hospitals in the city of Yazd, Iran), and American hospitals were used for comparison purposes in this paper.
在相关文献中,建立患者安全文化(PSC)是为患者提供优质服务的重要步骤。本研究的目的是为伊朗学术医院建立 PSC 的基准,并确定其优势和劣势。
在与伊朗和德黑兰医科大学相关的 26 家学术医院中进行了一项调查,其中 18 家参与了调查。调查问卷采用医院患者安全文化调查(HSOPSC),收集数据。问卷包含 14 个维度和 43 个项目,问题采用 5 级李克特量表进行评分,其中 1 表示非常不同意,5 表示非常同意。结果以正面回答的百分比(%)表示,即对正面项目(例如,“医院各部门为患者提供最佳护理”)的正面回答百分比(例如,同意,强烈同意)与对负面项目(例如,“当事件报告时,感觉就像是在写人,而不是问题”)的负面回答百分比之间的关系。为了对每个项目进行评分,采用以下公式:正面回答的百分比(%)= [(同意人数+完全同意人数)/回答问题的总人数] × 100%。对于负面项目,答案是相反的。为了对每个维度进行评分,估计了正面回答的综合平均值。对每个医院的 PSC 也采用了相同的方法进行评分(即,获得 12 个维度的正面回答综合平均值)。(请注意,本文档表格中报告的数据代表百分比,为了便于交流,在所述表格中省略了“%”。然而,在文本中,我们在需要的地方使用了百分比。)为了将医院的安全文化从非常弱到非常强进行分类,将 PSC 问卷的 0.0%至 100%的正面回答范围除以 5((100% - 0.0%)/ 5 = 20%),并定义了 5 个均等间隔的区间(即,0.0%-20.0%,非常弱;21.0%-40.0%,弱;41.0%-60.0%,中等;61.0%-80.0%,强;81.0%-100.0%,非常强)。采用便利抽样法选择样本。在本研究中,每个医院随机发放 35 份问卷:15 份给护士和助理护士(作为与患者有最直接接触的一线人员),20 份给其他临床和辅助临床人员以及其他组(医生、住院医师、实习生、病房秘书、实验室人员、放射科人员和管理人员)。医院护士长负责发放和收集问卷。使用单样本和独立 t 检验对数据进行分析。
医院在 PSC 上的平均得分为 42.74 至 67.22 分,18 家医院中有 12 家获得“中等”排名,6 家获得“强”排名。整个医院的 PSC 总体平均(SD)得分为 56.74(18.41)。伊朗和德黑兰医科大学的医院在 PSC 方面没有显著差异。然而,在维度和项目层面上存在显著差异。医院的优势在于“组织学习-持续改进”、“医院各部门之间的团队合作”和“医院管理层对患者安全的支持”维度。包括“关于错误的反馈和沟通”、“沟通开放性”、“人员配备”和“对错误的非惩罚性反应”在内的维度是所有参与研究的医院的弱点。
调查医院的 PSC 水平不理想,需要认真改进,特别是在关于错误的反馈和沟通、沟通开放性、人员配备和对错误的非惩罚性反应方面。伊朗的其他医院(即伊朗亚兹德市的 Afshar 和 Sadoughi 医院)也存在同样的情况,本文还将美国医院作为比较。